首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases >Comparison of pre-dilation with a non-compliant balloon versus a dual wire scoring balloon for coronary stenting
【24h】

Comparison of pre-dilation with a non-compliant balloon versus a dual wire scoring balloon for coronary stenting

机译:非顺应性球囊预扩张与双线划痕球囊在冠状动脉支架置入术中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of lesion preparation using the dual wire scoring balloon on stent expansion and long-term outcomes. Methods: Forty-six consecutive de novo lesions treated with a single >2.5 mm drug-eluting stent under intravascular ultrasound guidance, using two implantation strategies, were randomly assigned to: 1) pre-dilation with a non-compliant balloon (NC group; n = 23) or 2) pre-dilation with a dual wire scoring balloon (DS group; n = 23). Results: Although the balloon size and the maximal dilation pressure for pre-dilatation was larger (3.33 ± 0.28 vs 3.09 ± 0.33 mm, p = 0.01) and higher (11.6 ± 3.2 vs 8.6 ± 2.7 atm, p
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定使用双金属丝刻痕气囊对病变的准备对支架扩张和长期预后的影响。方法:采用两种植入策略,在血管内超声引导下,采用单个> 2.5 mm药物洗脱支架治疗的46例连续从头病变,随机分为以下两种:1)用不顺应性球囊预扩张(NC组; n = 23)或2)用双金属丝划痕球囊预扩张(DS组; n = 23)。结果:尽管预扩张的球囊尺寸和最大扩张压力更大(3.33±0.28 vs 3.09±0.33 mm,p = 0.01)和更高(11.6±3.2 vs 8.6±2.7 atm,p

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号