...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Emergency Surgery >Safety in selective surgical exploration in penetrating neck trauma
【24h】

Safety in selective surgical exploration in penetrating neck trauma

机译:选择性手术探查在穿透性颈部创伤中的安全性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Selective management of penetrating neck injuries has been considered the standard of care with minimal risks to patient safety. In a previous non-randomized prospective study conducted at our center, selective management proved to be safe and reduced unnecessary exploratory cervicotomies. In the present study, the role of clinical examination and selective diagnostic tests were assessed by reviewing demographic and clinical data. A comparison of results between two groups (mandatory surgical exploration versus selective surgical exploration) was made to check the safety of selective management in terms of the rates of morbidity and mortality. Methods A retrospective analysis at the Emergency Department of the Hospital das Clínicas of the University of Sao Paulo was performed by a chart review of our trauma registry, identifying 161 penetrating neck trauma victims. Results Of the 161 patients, 81.6?% were stabbed and 18.4?% had gunshot injuries. Stratifying the wound entry points by neck zones, we observed that zone I was penetrated in 32.8?%, zone II in 44.1?% and zone III in 23.1?% of all the cases. Thirty one patients (19.2?%) had immediate surgical exploration, which had a mean length of stay of 6?days, a complication rate of 12.9?% and a mortality rate of 9.4?%. Of the 130 who underwent selective surgical exploration 34 (26.1?%) required operative procedures after careful physical examination and diagnostic testing based on clinical indications. The mean length of stay for the selective surgical exploration group was 2?days with a complication rate of 17.6?% with no mortality, and virtually all of them were related to associated injuries in distant body segment. No statistical significance was found comparing mortality and complication rates between the two groups. Selective approach avoided 59?% of unnecessary exploratory cervicotomies. Conclusion Careful evaluation of asymptomatic and stable patients with minor signs of injury can safely avoid unnecessary neck explorations with low rates of morbidity. This should be the standard management of such patients.
机译:背景技术对穿透性颈部损伤的选择性管理已被视为护理标准,对患者安全性的影响极小。在我们中心先前进行的非随机前瞻性研究中,选择性管理被证明是安全的,并减少了不必要的探索性宫颈切开术。在本研究中,通过回顾人口统计学和临床​​数据评估了临床检查和选择性诊断测试的作用。比较两组(强制性手术探查与选择性手术探查)的结果,以检查发病率和死亡率方面的选择性管理的安全性。方法通过对我们创伤登记处的图表审查,对圣保罗大学达拉斯克利尼卡斯医院急诊科进行回顾性分析,确定了161名穿透性颈部创伤的受害者。结果161名患者中有81.6%被刺伤,18.4%被枪伤。按颈部区域划分伤口进入点,我们观察到在所有病例中,I区穿透率为32.8%,II区穿透率为44.1%,III区穿透率为23.1%。 31例(19.2%)患者立即进行了外科手术探查,平均住院时间为6天,并发症发生率为12.9%,死亡率为9.4%。在接受选择性外科手术探查的130名患者中,有34名(26.1%)在根据临床指征进行了仔细的身体检查和诊断测试后需要进行手术。选择性手术探查组的平均住院天数为2天,并发症发生率为17.6%,无死亡,实际上所有这些患者均与远身段的相关伤害有关。比较两组之间的死亡率和并发症发生率没有统计学意义。选择性方法避免了不必要的探索性宫颈切开术的59%。结论仔细评估无症状,稳定且有轻度损伤迹象的患者可以安全地避免不必要的颈部探查,且发病率低。这应该是这类患者的标准治疗方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号