首页> 外文期刊>Water Alternatives: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Water Politics and Development >Transdisciplinary research in water sustainability: What’s in it for an engaged researcher-stakeholder community?
【24h】

Transdisciplinary research in water sustainability: What’s in it for an engaged researcher-stakeholder community?

机译:关于水可持续性的跨学科研究:对于一个从事研究的利益相关者社区来说,它有什么意义?

获取原文
       

摘要

This study uses semi-structured interviews and an online survey to explore the structure, challenges and outcomes of a five-year National Science Foundation-funded water scarcity modelling project in the Willamette River Basin of Oregon, USA. The research team chose to facilitate broader impacts by engaging stakeholders from the study’s inception (e.g. developing grant proposal, study implementations, defining model run scenarios) through its completion and extension of findings. The team used various engagement formats (field trips, small and large group meetings) and encountered many challenges, including the lack of a shared vision, different professional languages, research complexities and project management. Through stakeholder engagement the team overcame challenges, facilitated learning, and improved and extended the research process and results. Participation in engagement events was positively correlated with beneficial broader impact outcomes. We compare these outcomes with NSF’s five broader impact criteria: advance scientific discovery and understanding, broaden participation of underrepresented groups, enhance research infrastructure, broadly disseminate results, and benefit society. We show that stakeholder engagement is one method to achieve the five original NSF criteria and suggest that a sixth criterion can be achieved through stakeholder engagement – that of developing the research community.
机译:这项研究使用半结构化访谈和在线调查来探索美国俄勒冈州威拉米特河流域国家科学基金会资助的为期五年的水资源短缺建模项目的结构,挑战和成果。研究小组选择通过从研究开始到完成和扩展研究结果等过程中吸引利益相关者参与,以促进更广泛的影响。该团队采用了多种参与方式(实地考察,小型和大型小组会议),并遇到了许多挑战,包括缺乏共同的愿景,不同的专业语言,研究复杂性和项目管理。通过利益相关者的参与,团队克服了挑战,促进了学习,并改善和扩展了研究过程和结果。参与参与活动与有益的广泛影响结果呈正相关。我们将这些成果与NSF的五个更广泛的影响标准进行了比较:促进科学发现和了解,扩大代表性不足的群体的参与度,增强研究基础设施,广泛传播成果并造福社会。我们表明,利益相关者的参与是达到NSF五个原始标准的一种方法,并建议通过利益相关者的参与(开发研究社区)可以达到第六个标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号