...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research Procedia >Evaluation of red RRFB implementation at freeway off-ramps and its effectiveness on alleviating wrong-way driving
【24h】

Evaluation of red RRFB implementation at freeway off-ramps and its effectiveness on alleviating wrong-way driving

机译:高速公路匝道外红色RRFB实施评估及其对减轻误行驾驶的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract: Wrong-way crashes are a major cause for safety concern along freeways and limited access facilities. This study investigated three different aspects of the use of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs): 1) different settings of red RRFBs and their perceived effectiveness on reducing wrong-way driving based on a public opinion survey, 2) the effect of active red RRFBs on the behavior of drivers traveling on adjacent roadways via a before-and-after study, and 3) the effectiveness of red RRFBs on alleviating wrong-way driving on freeway off-ramps by analyzing the percentage of vehicles turning back after observing the red RRFB activation. Based on the public opinion survey results, the most informative warning red RRFB combination was determined and implemented in this study. The evaluation of the impact of red RRFB implementation (at six I-275 off-ramps in Tampa, FL, USA) on driving behaviors along adjacent arterials indicated that the implementation of red RRFBs did not adversely impact driving behaviors on adjacent arterials. To determine the effectiveness of red flashing beacons and RRFBs on alleviating wrong-way driving on freeway off-ramps, video recordings of red flashing beacons and RRFBs mounted on wrong-way signs were analyzed. Red RRFBs were deemed to be a more effective countermeasure to deter wrong-way driving than red flashing beacons. Six-months of video data were collected for red flashing beacons mounted on wrong-way signs, and video data collection for red RRFBs mounted on wrong-way signs is currently underway. For red flashing beacons, a high percentage of wrong-way drivers in this study made a U-turn and went back in the correct traffic flow direction upon realizing they were traveling in the wrong direction. It is expected that red RRFBs will be more effective on alleviating wrong-way driving due to their capabilities to inform drivers of wrong-way driving than those from red flashing beacons. The video data analysis for red RRFBs will be presented in a separate paper.
机译:摘要:误撞是高速公路和有限通道设施安全问题的主要原因。这项研究调查了使用矩形快速闪烁信标(RRFB)的三个不同方面:1)基于民意调查的红色RRFB的不同设置及其在减少错误驾驶方面的感知有效性,2)主动红色RRFB的效果通过前后研究研究在相邻道路上行驶的驾驶员的行为,以及3)通过分析观察到红色RRFB后转弯的车辆百分比,红色RRFB在缓解高速公路匝道上的错误驾驶方面的有效性激活。基于民意调查结果,本研究确定并实施了信息最丰富的红色RRFB预警组合。评估红色RRFB的实施(在美国佛罗里达坦帕市的六个I-275匝道外)对沿相邻动脉的驾驶行为的影响表明,红色RRFB的实施不会对相邻动脉的驾驶行为产生不利影响。为了确定红色闪烁信标和RRFB在缓解高速公路匝道上的错误驾驶方面的有效性,分析了安装在错误指示标志上的红色闪烁信标和RRFB的视频记录。与红色闪烁的信标相比,红色RRFB被认为是阻止错误驾驶的更有效对策。为安装在错误指示牌上的红色闪烁信标收集了六个月的视频数据,目前正在收集在错误指示牌上安装的红色RRFB的视频数据。对于红色闪烁的信标,本研究中有很大比例的错误方向驾驶员掉头了,并意识到他们沿错误的方向行驶后又返回了正确的交通流方向。由于红色RRFB能够告知驾驶员错误驾驶的能力,因此它们会比红色闪烁信标的驾驶者更有效地缓解错误驾驶。红色RRFB的视频数据分析将在另一篇论文中介绍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号