...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research Procedia >Don’t Push the Red Button: A Case Against Manual Pedestrian Detection in Urban Areas
【24h】

Don’t Push the Red Button: A Case Against Manual Pedestrian Detection in Urban Areas

机译:不要按红色按钮:反对在市区进行手动行人侦查的案例

获取原文
           

摘要

Traffic lights in urban transport systems are often designed to take into account the situation on the road, i.e. detect vehicles and optimize road traffic flow. A wide variety of methods is employed to detect vehicles - from cameras through induction loops to laser radars. However, pedestrians are usually left with the rather antiquated method of pressing a button.Such an approach can generate a number of problems, especially if the light settings are based on the premise that manual and automatic activation of lights are equally effective, i.e. that every pedestrian will by default press the button at the moment s/he approaches the crossing. Such an assumption (one of several made when installing pedestrian buttons) is false due to a number of factors. These include the need for the pedestrian to: identify that the lights need to be activated (which is the case at only selected crossings), find a push button, walk up to it and activate it. Another assumption is that the pedestrian will wait until the light changes to cross the road, regardless of the situation on the intersection. While this has been shown to be a false premise in the past, it is particularly unlikely to hold true when the pedestrian sees that parallel traffic streams have a green light while s/he has a red one (due to not pressing a button or pressing it too late). Additional problems may stem from inadequate accessibility of the buttons, the insufficient number or noticeability thereof, or their being situated off the default (shortest) path.While pedestrian buttons are often treated as a default solution, manual detection is in fact a way of reducing the attractiveness and effectiveness of walking as a mode of transport. This may not be obvious, but it is enough to imagine a driver forced to go through the process delineated above (having to identify whether the lights will not change by themselves, if so - looking around for a way of activating them, moving to a given point where the lights can be activated, waiting for them to change, then going back to the track which was leading from the source of his/her journey to the destination) - at every intersection - to see that they are in fact a problem.The paper presents a discussion of approaches to the activation of pedestrian lights based on the situation in Poland, with particular focus on Warsaw, where field research was conducted. The problems outlined above are quantified and possible solutions thereto are suggested.
机译:城市交通系统中的交通信号灯通常被设计成考虑道路状况,即检测车辆并优化道路交通流量。从摄像机到感应环路再到激光雷达,各种各样的方法被用来检测车辆。但是,行人通常只剩下相当陈旧的按下按钮的方法。这种方法会产生许多问题,尤其是在灯光设置基于手动和自动激活灯光均有效的前提下,即行人默认在接近人行横道时按下按钮。由于多种因素,这种假设(在安装行人按钮时做出的一种假设)是错误的。其中包括行人需要:识别需要激活的灯光(仅在选定的十字路口就是这种情况),找到按钮,向上走并启动按钮。另一个假设是,不管交叉路口的情况如何,行人都将等到光线变化过马路。尽管过去已经证明这是错误的前提,但当行人看到并行交通流的指示灯为绿色而其行人的指示灯为红色时(由于未按按钮或按为时已晚)。其他问题可能是由于按钮的可访问性不足,按钮的数量不足或引人注目,或者它们位于默认(最短)路径之外而引起的。虽然行人按钮通常被视为默认解决方案,但手动检测实际上是一种减少操作的方法步行作为一种交通工具的吸引力和有效性。这可能并不明显,但是足以想象一个驾驶员被迫经历上面描述的过程(必须确定灯光是否会自行改变,如果是的话,那就四处寻找激活它们的方法,然后转向给定可以激活灯的点,等待它们改变,然后返回到从他/她的旅程起点到目的地的轨道)-在每个路口-都发现它们实际上是一个问题本文根据波兰的情况对行人灯的激活方法进行了讨论,特别是在华沙进行了现场研究的地方。上面概述的问题被量化,并提出了可能的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号