首页> 外文期刊>Wildlife Biology >Poor soils and density-mediated body weight in deer: forage quality or quantity?
【24h】

Poor soils and density-mediated body weight in deer: forage quality or quantity?

机译:鹿的土壤贫瘠和密度介导的体重:草料的质量或数量?

获取原文
       

摘要

Cervid studies have demonstrated body weight and lactation may be limited in areas with poor-quality soils, with the underlying mechanism often attributed to poor forage quality resulting from poor soil quality. However, if highly nutritious foods are produced but in limited quantities, selective foraging may alleviate nutritional stressors associated with poor soil productivity when adequate quantities of high-quality forage are obtained. We tested whether poor soil productivity limits forage from being high quality or conversely limits the abundance of high-quality forages. To do so, we determined whether nutrient concentrations in selected and non-selected forages on our poor soil study site met the nutritional requirements of lactating white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus assuming adequate amounts of forage are obtained. Also, we compared body weight of yearling males at a high density (13–17 deer km-2) and low density (3–5 deer km-2), because previous studies concluded soils on the study site were too poor for morphometrics (e.g. body weight) to be density-mediated. Deer selected plant species from each of five forage classes that would meet their nutritional requirements (i.e. assuming adequate forage intake) but also selected for different nutrients across forage classes. Phosphorus was limited in most forages, but deer selected forages that met P-requirements 10 times more than expected. We demonstrated body weight was 7.3% greater when deer density was low than high. Contrary to previous reports from poor productivity soil regions, deer on our study site should be able to meet lactation requirements when the quantity of high-quality forage is not limiting, and similarly body weight should be density-mediated. Hence, management strategies that alter the amount of forage per animal (i.e. decreasing animal density and/or increasing forage abundance) are viable options to promote desirable ungulate morphometrics in poor soil regions.
机译:某些研究表明,在土壤质量差的地区,体重和泌乳能力可能受到限制,其潜在机制通常归因于土壤质量差导致的草料质量差。但是,如果生产了营养丰富但数量有限的食物,那么当获得足够数量的优质牧草时,选择性觅食可能会减轻与土壤生产力差相关的营养压力。我们测试了差的土壤生产力是否会限制高质量的饲草,或者反过来限制了高质量饲草的数量。为此,我们确定了在假设贫困的土壤研究地点的精选草料和非精选草料中的养分含量是否满足泌乳白尾鹿维吉尼亚牛的营养需求,前提是要获得足够的草料。此外,我们比较了高密度(13–17鹿km -2 )和低密度(3–5鹿km -2 )一岁雄性的体重,因为先前的研究得出结论,研究地点的土壤太差,无法进行形态计量学(例如体重分析),无法通过密度进行介导。鹿从满足其营养要求(即假定摄入足够的草料)的五个草料类别中选择了每种植物,还选择了不同草料类别中的不同养分。磷在大多数草料中是有限的,但鹿所选择的满足P要求的草料比预期多10倍。我们证明,当鹿密度低而高时,体重增加了7.3%。与先前生产力不佳的土壤地区的报道相反,当高质量草料的数量不受限制时,我们研究地点的鹿应该能够满足泌乳要求,并且类似地,体重也应通过密度调节。因此,改变每只动物的饲草量(即降低动物密度和/或增加草料丰度)的管理策略是在贫困土壤地区促进理想的有蹄类动物形态计量学的可行选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号