...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Oncology >Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Cancer Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Assessment Tool: A Literature Review
【24h】

Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Cancer Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Assessment Tool: A Literature Review

机译:使用癌症治疗的功能评估-一般评估工具对晚期癌症患者的生活质量:文献综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Quality of life (QOL) has become an increasingly meaningful endpoint in advanced cancer research. Clinicians assess QOL to help them select appropriate treatment options and regimens. The present review aims to compare QOL scores of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Assessment Tool (FACT-G) in relation to clinical and socio-demographic features in patients with advanced cancer. A literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted; a total of 33 studies encompassing 39 study arms were identified that reported FACT-G scores. Four statistically significant parameters were identified with respect to FACT-G scores: education, national per capita healthcare expenditures, admittance status and previous radiation therapy. A greater percentage of patients completing higher education programs were correlated to significantly better emotional well-being and global QOL. Cohorts from countries with higher national per capita healthcare expenditures had better physical well-being, social/family well-being and improved relationships with their doctors. Patient samples comprised of purely outpatients had better levels of emotional well-being and global QOL when compared to samples with a mix of outpatients and inpatients. A greater percentage of patients previously receiving radiation therapy were correlated to a better relationship with doctor score. Although limitations of the present review exist, differences in QOL scores based on socio-demographic and clinical factors are observed; certain correlations described in the present work have been described previously in the literature while others have not. Future work aimed at either determining confounding parameters or cause and effect relationships is recommended.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon594w
机译:生活质量(QOL)已成为高级癌症研究中越来越有意义的终点。临床医生会评估QOL,以帮助他们选择合适的治疗方案和治疗方案。本文旨在比较晚期癌症患者的临床和社会人口统计学特征,比较癌症治疗功能评估通用评估工具(FACT-G)的QOL得分。在MEDLINE和EMBASE中进行了文献检索;总共鉴定出33个研究,涵盖39个研究分支,它们报告了FACT-G得分。关于FACT-G评分,确定了四个具有统计意义的参数:教育,国民人均医疗保健支出,入院状况和先前的放射治疗。完成高等教育课程的患者中,有更大比例的患者与良好的情绪健康和整体生活质量相关。来自人均国民医疗保健支出较高的国家的同龄人的身体健康,社会/家庭福祉得到改善,并改善了与医生的关系。与混合门诊病人和住院病人的样本相比,仅由门诊病人组成的病人样本的情绪幸福感和整体生活质量水平更高。以前接受放射治疗的患者中有更大比例与医生评分之间的关​​系更好。尽管本综述存在局限性,但观察到基于社会人口统计学和临床​​因素的生活质量得分差异;本工作中描述的某些关联在文献中已有描述,而其他关联则没有。建议将来进行旨在确定混淆参数或因果关系的工作。doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon594w

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号