首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Examining the Effect of the Affordable Care Act on Two Illinois Emergency Departments
【24h】

Examining the Effect of the Affordable Care Act on Two Illinois Emergency Departments

机译:审查《平价医疗法案》对伊利诺伊州两个急诊科的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: The emergency department (ED) has long served as a safety net for the uninsured and those with limited access to routine healthcare. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and severity of ED visits in an Illinois academic medical center (AMC) and community hospital (CH) of a single health system before and after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).Methods: This was a retrospective record review of 357,764 ED visits from January 1, 2011– December 31, 2016, of which 74% were at the AMC and 26% at the CH. We assessed the severity of ED visits by applying the previously validated Ballard algorithm, which classifies ED visits as non-emergent, intermediate, or emergent. Descriptive analyses were conducted to compare the characteristics of ED visits before and after the implementation of the ACA. We conducted multilevel logistic regression analysis to examine the odds of non-emergent compared to intermediate/emergent ED visits by the ACA implementation status controlling for patient demographic characteristics, insurance status, and multiple visits per patient.Results: ED visits for patients with Medicaid or other governmental coverages increased in the post-ACA compared to pre-ACA period (Pre: 33.2 % vs Post: 38.3% at the AMC, and Pre: 29.7% vs Post: 35.1% at the CH). A statistically significant decrease in ED visits for uninsured patients was observed at the AMC and CH in the post-ACA period compared to the pre-ACA period (Pre: 12.1% vs Post: 6.4%, and Pre: 13.9% vs Post: 9.8%, respectively). Results from the regression analysis showed a significant decreased odds of non-emergent vs intermediate/emergent ED visits during the post-ACA period compared to the pre-ACA period at the AMC (odds ratio [OR] 0.68; confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.70). However, an increased odds of non-emergent vs. intermediate/emergent ED visits was observed at the CH (OR 1.09; CI, 1.04-1.14).Conclusion: Similar to other Medicaid expansion states, ED utilization for uninsured patients decreased at both the AMC and the CH in the post-ACA period. While Medicaid visits for children 18 years declined in the post-ACA period, it increased for ages 21 to 65 years of age. Contrary to our hypothesis, the severity of emergent ED visits increased in the post-ACA period but not at the CH.
机译:简介:急诊科(ED)长期以来一直为没有保险的人和无法获得常规医疗服务的人提供安全网。这项研究旨在比较在实施《平价医疗法案》(ACA)之前和之后在单个卫生系统的伊利诺伊州学术医学中心(AMC)和社区医院(CH)进行急诊就诊的特点和严重程度。对2011年1月1日至2016年12月31日急诊就诊的357,764例急诊就诊进行回顾性记录回顾,其中74%在AMC,26%在CH。我们通过应用先前验证的Ballard算法评估了急诊就诊的严重程度,该算法将急诊就诊分为非紧急,中间或紧急情况。进行了描述性分析,以比较实施ACA之前和之后的急诊就诊的特征。我们进行了多级Logistic回归分析,以通过ACA实施状态控制患者人口统计学特征,保险状况以及每位患者多次就诊的非急诊与中/急诊ED访视的几率进行比较。结果:对于Medicaid或与ACA之前相比,ACA之后的其他政府覆盖率有所增加(AMC之前为33.2%,而职位为:38.3%,CH之前为29.7%,而职位之后为35.1%)。与ACA之前相比,ACA之后的AMC和CH期间未保险患者的ED访视在统计学上显着减少(之前:12.1%vs后期:6.4%,以及:13.9%vs后期:9.8) %, 分别)。回归分析的结果表明,在AMC期间,ACA后非急诊访视与中/急诊ED访视的机率比ACA之前时期明显降低(赔率[OR]为0.68;置信区间[CI], 0.66-0.70)。但是,在CH观察到非急诊与中/急诊就诊的几率增加(OR 1.09; CI,1.04-1.14)。结论:与其他医疗补助扩张状态相似,未参保患者的ED利用率在两个期间均下降。 AMC后的AMC和CH。在ACA之后,针对18岁以下儿童的医疗补助探访次数有所减少,但21至65岁年龄段的医疗补助探访次数却有所增加。与我们的假设相反,急诊急诊就诊的严重程度在ACA后时期有所增加,但在CH却没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号