...
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >The Social Media Index: Measuring the Impact of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Websites
【24h】

The Social Media Index: Measuring the Impact of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Websites

机译:社会媒体指数:衡量急诊和重症监护网站的影响

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: The number of educational resources created for emergency medicine and criticalcare (EMCC) that incorporate social media has increased dramatically. With no way to assess theirimpact or quality, it is challenging for educators to receive scholarly credit and for learners to identifyrespected resources. The Social Media index (SMi) was developed to help address this. Methods: We used data from social media platforms (Google PageRanks, Alexa Ranks, FacebookLikes, Twitter Followers, and Google+ Followers) for EMCC blogs and podcasts to derive threenormalized (ordinal, logarithmic, and raw) formulas. The most statistically robust formula wasassessed for 1) temporal stability using repeated measures and website age, and 2) correlationwith impact by applying it to EMCC journals and measuring the correlation with known journalimpact metrics. Results: The logarithmic version of the SMi containing four metrics was the most statistically robust.It correlated significantly with website age (Spearman r=0.372; p<0.001) and repeated measuresthrough seven months (r=0.929; p<0.001). When applied to EMCC journals, it correlated significantlywith all impact metrics except number of articles published. The strongest correlations were seenwith the Immediacy Index (r=0.609; p<0.001) and Article Influence Score (r=0.608; p<0.001). Conclusion: The SMi’s temporal stability and correlation with journal impact factors suggests thatit may be a stable indicator of impact for medical education websites. Further study is needed todetermine whether impact correlates with quality and how learners and educators can best utilizethis tool. [West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(2):242–249.] DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24860.
机译:简介:为融合社会媒体而为急诊医学和重症监护(EMCC)创建的教育资源的数量急剧增加。由于无法评估其影响或质量,教育者要获得学术信誉,学习者要确定受尊重的资源是一项挑战。开发社交媒体索引(SMi)可以帮助解决此问题。方法:我们使用来自社交媒体平台(Google PageRanks,Alexa Ranks,FacebookLikes,Twitter关注者和Google+关注者)的数据用于EMCC博客和播客,以得出三个标准化的(普通,对数和原始)公式。对最统计上最可靠的公式进行了评估,包括:1)使用重复测量和网站年龄的时间稳定性,以及2)通过将其应用于EMCC期刊并测量与已知期刊影响指标的相关性来评估影响。结果:包含四个指标的SMi的对数形式在统计上最稳健,它与网站年龄(Spearman r = 0.372; p <0.001)和重复测量到七个月(r = 0.929; p <0.001)显着相关。当应用于EMCC期刊时,它与所有影响指标(发布的文章数量除外)都具有显着相关性。即时指数(r = 0.609; p <0.001)和文章影响力评分(r = 0.608; p <0.001)之间的相关性最强。结论:SMi的时间稳定性以及与期刊影响因素的相关性表明,它可能是对医学教育网站影响的稳定指标。需要进一步研究以确定影响是否与质量相关,以及学习者和教育者如何才能最好地利用此工具。 [西急救医学杂志。 2015; 16(2):242–249。] DOI:10.5811 / westjem.2015.1.24860。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号