...
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >A Case Report and Postulated Systematic Approach to the Evaluation of Emotionalism Post Stroke in a Crisis Unit
【24h】

A Case Report and Postulated Systematic Approach to the Evaluation of Emotionalism Post Stroke in a Crisis Unit

机译:危机单位中风情绪评估的病例报告和假设的系统方法

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Emotionalism post stroke, when inadequately addressed, can cause distress to patients including embarrassment, confusion, possible caregiver complaints, and an overall decrease in health-related quality of life (Badhan, et al, 2014). Also known as pathological laughing and crying (PLC), emotionalism post stroke refers to the involuntary and neurologic pseudo-bulbar affect (PBA). It often leads to uncontrolled and exaggerated expressions of inappropriate, emotionally charged outbursts such as laughing and/or crying (Parvizi, et al, 2001). This “emotional lability” is usually seen in patients with neurological disorders, in particular stroke, and was first described in the literature in 1872. While the exact mechanism can be debated, studies suggest a lesion in the upper brainstem leading to involuntary triggering of the facio-respiratory patterns associated with laughter and crying that involve the motor cortices (Parvizi, et al. 2001) or the cerebellum (Sak, Wilson, 1924). However, with recent studies reporting the prevalence of depression as high as 29% post stroke (Ayerbe, et al, 2013), identifying differences between post-stroke depression and PBA in the emergency setting is crucial for appropriate treatment and disposition. A critical component of patient history with regard to PLC is the lack of inciting stimulus in reports of numerous episodes of pathological crying. This study aims to outline a systematic approach to evaluate and manage patients with PLC in the emergency department (ED). Case Presentation: The patient was a 74-year-old Caucasian male with no formal PPH and PMH of T2D, HLD, HTN, who was brought by his wife to the ED with complaints of excessive crying and a reported verbalization of suicidal ideation. Upon interview, patient stated that he had been having "crying spells" in excess of emotional stimulus for the prior three months, increasing in severity. He denied neuro-vegetative symptoms of depression. Patient also denied recent stressors. He admitted to a transient ischemic attack five months prior to his presentation. He stated there were no neurological deficits at the time of encounter except for a noted decreased sense of taste. The patient admitted to having suicidal ideations (SI) but without intent, plan, or means. He determined that he had intermittent SI in the context of observing, "Doesn't everyone think about that sometimes?" He did not report details of his SI as he determined they were passive and vague thoughts of what it would be like to be dead. He denied past or recent suicide attempts or self-injurious behavior. The patient reported he had met with his primary care physician who advised him to go to the ED for further evaluation. The patient and his wife, also in her 70s, reported they thought the ED could prescribe medications and were not seeking hospitalization. His wife stated that the patient had been “crying at the drop of a hat.” She noted that this was not usual for him and denied any recent stressors, or past episodes. She further stated, “I was at my wit’s end and I feel like something is wrong with him.” Patient stated the breaking point was his inability to attend an important engagement due to a dis-inhibited “crying spell” that lasted 10 minutes. He and his wife reported frustration. The patient also reported, “I can’t take it. Please help me.” Patient affect was depressed, with intermittent “episodes of crying.” We placed him on hold and re-evaluate status.?Method: Patient consent for this study was obtained. A literature search was performed in PubMed and JAMA Psychiatry for articles published on pathological laughing and crying since 1900, using multiple combinations of the search terms, which included the following: post stroke crying syndrome, emotionalism post stroke, involuntary emotional expression, and post stroke neurological disorders. The development of evidence approach and drafting of systemic approach.?Results: On observation, the patient had depressed affect and intermittent episodes of crying without provocation. He repeatedly denied being depressed and denied neuro-vegetative symptoms of depression despite his affect. Psychological review of systems was negative. Vital signs, complete blood count, and electrolytes were within normal limits. Collateral information was obtained and old chart review revealed mild to moderate small-vessel ischemic changes, including a semi-ovale infarct five months prior to presentation. His wife stated she wanted help for his presumed depression. Clinical pathway for the evaluation of emotionalism post stroke in the crisis unit includes performing the following: patient intake and triaging à medical clearance and laboratory work à patient history, and collateral information à If patient psychiatrically stable by negative psychological review of systems, consider past medical history for risk factors significant for stroke à consider ancillary tests to rule out differential diagnoses
机译:简介:中风后的情绪主义如果处理不当,可能会给患者带来困扰,包括尴尬,困惑,可能的照顾者抱怨以及与健康相关的生活质量全面下降(Badhan等,2014)。中风后情绪化也称为病理性的笑声和哭泣(PLC),是指非自愿的和神经系统的假性球感(PBA)。它常常导致不适当的,夸张的表情表达不适当的,情绪激动的爆发,例如笑和/或哭泣(Parvizi等,2001)。这种“情绪失常”通常见于神经系统疾病的患者,特别是中风,并于1872年首次在文献中描述。虽然确切的机制尚有争议,但研究表明,上脑干病变导致非自愿触发。与笑声和哭泣有关的面部呼吸模式,涉及运动皮层(Parvizi等,2001)或小脑(Sak,Wilson,1924)。但是,随着最近的研究报道,卒中后抑郁症的患病率高达29%(Ayerbe等人,2013),因此在紧急情况下确定卒中后抑郁症与PBA之间的差异对于正确的治疗和处置至关重要。关于PLC的患者病史的一个重要组成部分是在许多病理性哭声发作的报告中缺乏刺激性刺激。这项研究旨在概述评估和管理急诊科(ED)的PLC患者的系统方法。病例介绍:该患者是一名74岁的白​​人男性,没有正式的PPH和T2D,HLD,HTN的PMH,他的妻子将其带到急诊室,抱怨过度哭泣和据称有自杀念头。接受采访时,患者表示在过去的三个月中,他的“哭泣咒语”超过了情绪刺激,严重程度增加了。他否认抑郁症的神经营养症状。患者还否认了最近的压力源。他在就诊前五个月就接受了短暂性脑缺血发作。他说,相遇时没有神经系统缺陷,只是味觉下降。患者承认有自杀意念(SI),但没有意图,计划或手段。他确定自己在观察的过程中出现间歇性SI,“每个人有时都不会考虑吗?”他没有报告自己的SI的详细信息,因为他确定这些信息是消极的,并且对即将死去的状态含糊其词。他否认过去或最近的自杀企图或自残行为。该患者报告说他曾与他的初级保健医生会面,并建议他去急诊室做进一步评估。患者和他的妻子也都是在70多岁时,都报告说他们认为ED可以开药并且没有寻求住院治疗。他的妻子说病人一直在“哭泣”。她指出,这对他而言并不常见,并否认了最近的压力或过去的发作。她进一步说:“我正处于机智的境地,他觉得自己出了点问题。”患者说,突破点是由于持续超过10分钟的禁止“哭泣咒语”而无法参加重要的活动。他和妻子报告无奈。病人还报告说:“我不能接受。请帮我。”患者情绪低落,伴有间歇性的“哭泣声”。我们将他搁置并重新评估其状态。方法:获得本研究的患者同意。自1900年以来,在PubMed和JAMA Psychiatry中对文献进行了文献检索,检索了多种检索词组合,包括以下各项:中风后哭泣综合症,中风后情绪化,非自愿情绪表达和中风后检索词神经系统疾病。结果:经观察,患者情绪低落,哭声间歇性发作,无刺激。尽管有他的影响,他一再否认沮丧,并否认抑郁的神经营养症状。系统的心理学评论是负面的。生命体征,全血细胞计数和电解质均在正常范围内。获得了辅助信息,并且旧的图表检查显示,轻度至中度的小血管缺血性改变,包括在出现前五个月出现了半卵形梗塞。他的妻子说她想为他的抑郁症寻求帮助。在危机部门评估中风后情绪主义的临床途径包括执行以下步骤:患者摄入和分类à医疗许可和实验室工作à患者病史和附带信息à如果患者通过对系统的负面心理检查而精神病稳定,请考虑过去的医疗中风重要危险因素的病史à考虑辅助检查以排除鉴别诊断

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号