首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Impact of Interpolated Questions on Podcast Knowledge Acquisition and Retention: A Double-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Impact of Interpolated Questions on Podcast Knowledge Acquisition and Retention: A Double-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:内插问题对播客知识获取和保留的影响:双盲,多中心,随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Podcasting is a frequently used mediain contemporary medical education, but there is minimalevidence evaluating techniques that enhance knowledgeacquisition and retention. Adding embedded questions hasbeen shown to improve learning in online lectures; this has notbeen studied with podcasting.Objectives: This study evaluated whether placinginterpolated questions into a podcast improved short- andlong-term knowledge in postgraduate emergency medicine(EM) trainees.Methods: This double-blinded, controlled trialrandomized postgraduate trainees from six EM programsin the United States to one of two versions of a podcast,produced de novo on the history of hypertension. The versionswere identical except that one included five interpolatedquestions to highlight educational points. The post-podcastassessment consisted of 15 multiple-choice questions, withfive questions directly related to the interpolated questionsand 10 questions unrelated to them. Assessment occurredtwice; once within 48 hours of listening and the second twothreeweeks later. The primary outcome was the difference ininter-group mean assessment scores at each time point. Wecalculated a sample size of 67 participants per arm a priori toidentify a significant inter-arm difference.Results: A total of 137 EM trainees were randomizedand completed both assessments (69 in the non-interpolatedarm and 68 in the interpolated arm). There were no significantdifferences in demographic characteristics. Though nosignificant difference was detected at the first assessment, thesecond assessment demonstrated significantly higher relativemean scores in the interpolated arm by 10.9% (95% confidenceinterval [CI], 0.5-21.3%; p = 0.041). For the questions related tothe educational points that the interpolated questions addressed,the interpolated arm had significantly greater relative meanknowledge scores at both time points at 16.0% (95% CI, 3.0-29.1%; p = 0.016) and 21.5% (95% CI, 6.0-37.0%; p = 0.007),respectively. There was not a significant intergroup differencefor the non-interpolated questions.Conclusion: Improvement in knowledge acquisition andretention was demonstrated for those whose podcast containedinterpolated questions. This difference was driven by theimprovement in retention for the material highlighted by theinterpolated questions.
机译:背景:播客是当代医学教育中经常使用的媒体,但是有最小的证据评估技术可以增强知识的获取和保留。已经显示出添加嵌入式问题可以改善在线讲座的学习;目的:本研究评估了是否将插值问题放入播客中,以改善研究生急诊医学(EM)受训者的短期和长期知识。方法:该双盲,受控,随机试验的来自六个EM计划的研究生受训者美国以播客的两个版本之一出版,从头开始制作关于高血压病的历史。除包括五个内插问题以突出教育要点外,其他版本相同。播后评估包括15个多项选择题,其中5个直接与插值问题相关,另10个与它们无关。评估发生了两次;一次在听力48小时内,第二三个三周后。主要结果是每个时间点的组间平均评估得分之间的差异。我们事先计算出每组67名参与者的样本量,以识别出显着的组间差异。结果:总共对137名EM学员进行了随机分组并完成了两项评估(非插值组为69名,插值组为68名)。人口统计学特征无显着差异。尽管在第一次评估中未发现显着差异,但第二次评估显示,插值组的相对平均得分明显提高了10.9%(95%置信区间[CI],0.5-21.3%; p = 0.041)。对于与插值问题解决的教育点相关的问题,插值臂在两个时间点的相对平均知识得分均明显更高,分别为16.0%(95%CI,3.0-29.1%; p = 0.016)和21.5%(95%CI) ,分别为6.0-37.0%; p = 0.007)。结论:对于播客中包含内插问题的人,知识获取和保留能力得到了改善。这种差异是由内插问题突出显示的材料保留时间的提高驱动的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号