...
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Teamwork between Engineering and Medicine: Collaborative Training in the Emergency Department
【24h】

Teamwork between Engineering and Medicine: Collaborative Training in the Emergency Department

机译:工程与医学之间的团队合作:急诊科的合作培训

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) 9 and 13 are to “collaborate as a member of an interprofessional team” and to “identify system failures thereby contributing to a culture of safety and improvement.” Addressing EPA 9, an interprofessional initiative was begun using a project team between two university programs: medical education and health systems engineering. Addressing EPA 13, this team set out to provide diagnostic analytics for Length of Stay (LOS) delays in the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: This project was performed in 2018 at an ED with 42 beds, an annual census of 70,000, and a 38% admission rate. Two healthcare systems engineering students and a medical student performed on-site observations to identify specific bottlenecks that could contribute to ED LOS. This data and data generated from the electronic medical record were analyzed and correlated with observations. Factors (44) that affect ED processes were analyzed, including time interval metrics such as arrival to triage, arrival to admit, disposition to departure, and bed request to admit. Results: Patients had an average LOS of 5.9 hours. A total of 4,940 adult, non-psychiatric cases presented; 1,599 (32.4%) of these were admitted. Process evaluation (Figure, mean and median minutes) showed differences between day (7a-7p) and night (7p-7a) flow patterns. These quantitative results (EPA 13) were determined by the interprofessional collaborative work efforts of the students (qualitatively, the outcome of EPA 9).This project demonstrated a synergistic educational experience that allowed the blending of medical education with process engineering, ultimately improving knowledge gaps of both. This unique process allowed for diagnostics to be performed that were necessary for the ED and simultaneously provided a stronger foundation for QI undertakings for both engineering and medical students. Conclusion: Medical students can benefit from working alongside systems engineers, allowing them to see the value of using tools (simulation modeling, statistical analysis, process flow mapping, etc.) to uncover evidence-based improvements to a variety of medical processes. Healthcare systems engineering students can gain valuable experience in a complex medical environment. Looking for solutions to the disparity between flow during the day and night is an opportunity for future study.
机译:简介:委托专业活动(EPA)9和13旨在“作为跨专业团队的成员进行协作”,并“识别系统故障,从而促进安全和改进的文化。”在EPA 9大会上,一个跨专业的计划开始使用两个大学计划之间的项目团队:医学教育和卫生系统工程。在针对EPA 13的讲话中,该团队着手为急诊部(ED)的住院时间(LOS)延误提供诊断分析。方法:该项目于2018年在ED上进行,床位42张,年度人口普查为70,000,录取率为38%。两名医疗系统工程专业的学生和一名医学专业的学生进行了现场观察,以确定可能导致ED LOS的具体瓶颈。分析该数据和从电子病历生成的数据,并将其与观察结果相关联。分析了影响ED过程的因素(44),包括时间间隔度量标准,例如到达分类,到达准入,离开的处置以及床位准入等。结果:患者的平均LOS为5.9小时。总共报告了4,940例成人非精神病病例;其中1,599(32.4%)被录取。过程评估(图,平均和中位数分钟)显示了白天(7a-7p)和晚上(7p-7a)流量模式之间的差异。这些定量结果(EPA 13)是由学生的跨专业合作努力(定性地是EPA 9的结果)确定的。该项目展示了协同的教育经验,使医学教育与过程工程相融合,最终改善了知识鸿沟两者。这种独特的过程使得能够执行ED所必需的诊断,同时为工程和医学专业的QI事业提供了更坚实的基础。结论:医学系学生可以从与系统工程师的合作中受益,使他们看到使用工具(模拟建模,统计分析,过程流图等)的价值,以发现基于证据的各种医学过程改进。医疗保健系统工程专业的学生可以在复杂的医疗环境中获得宝贵的经验。寻找解决昼夜流量差异的解决方案是未来研究的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号