首页> 外文期刊>Water >Surface Water Quality Evaluation Based on a Game Theory-Based Cloud Model
【24h】

Surface Water Quality Evaluation Based on a Game Theory-Based Cloud Model

机译:基于博弈论云模型的地表水水质评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Water quality evaluation is an essential measure to analyze water quality. However, excessive randomness and fuzziness affect the process of evaluation, thus reducing the accuracy of evaluation. Therefore, this study proposed a cloud model for evaluating the water quality to alleviate this problem. Analytic hierarchy process and entropy theory were used to calculate the subjective weight and objective weight, respectively, and then they were coupled as a combination weight (CW) via game theory. The proposed game theory-based cloud model (GCM) was then applied to the Qixinggang section of the Beijiang River. The results show that the CW ranks fecal coliform as the most important factor, followed by total nitrogen and total phosphorus, while biochemical oxygen demand and fluoride were considered least important. There were 19 months (31.67%) at grade I, 39 months (65.00%) at grade II, and one month at grade IV and grade V during 2010–2014. A total of 52 months (86.6%) of GCM were identical to the comprehensive evaluation result (CER). The obtained water quality grades of GCM are close to the grades of the analytic hierarchy process weight (AHPW) due to the weight coefficient of AHPW set to 0.7487. Generally, one or two grade gaps exist among the results of the three groups of weights, suggesting that the index weight is not particularly sensitive to the cloud model. The evaluated accuracy of water quality can be improved by modifying the quantitative boundaries. This study could provide a reference for water quality evaluation, prevention, and improvement of water quality assessment and other applications.
机译:水质评估是分析水质的必要措施。但是,过多的随机性和模糊性会影响评估过程,从而降低评估的准确性。因此,本研究提出了一种用于评估水质的云模型来缓解这一问题。运用层次分析法和熵理论分别计算主观权重和客观权重,然后通过博弈论将它们作为组合权重(CW)进行耦合。然后将提出的基于博弈论的云模型(GCM)应用于北江七星岗段。结果表明,连续波将粪便大肠菌排在最重要的位置,其次是总氮和总磷,而生化需氧量和氟化物被认为是最不重要的。在2010-2014年期间,一年级的时间为19个月(31.67%),二年级的时间为39个月(65.00%),四年级和五年级的时间为一个月。总共52个月(86.6%)的GCM与综合评估结果(CER)相同。由于将AHPW的权重系数设置为0.7487,因此所获得的GCM水质等级接近于层次分析过程权重(AHPW)的等级。通常,三组权重的结果之间存在一到两个等级差距,这表明指标权重对云模型不是特别敏感。可以通过修改定量边界来提高评估的水质准确性。这项研究可以为水质评估,预防,改善水质评估和其他应用提供参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号