首页> 外文期刊>Voice of the Publisher >To Be or Not to Be …? Part III: Diesel versus Electrically Powered Cars
【24h】

To Be or Not to Be …? Part III: Diesel versus Electrically Powered Cars

机译:生存还是毁灭 …?第三部分:柴油与电动汽车

获取原文
           

摘要

X5 and 335d model diesel cars built by Bayerische Motoren Werke Ak-tiengesellschaft (BMW AG) between 2009 and 2011 were sued in a USA court in New Jersey for creating more pollution on the roads than in laboratory tests. BMW AG used testing methods similar to those admitted to by Volkswagen AG for cheating authorities (https://www.bloomberg.comews/articles/2018-03-27/bmw-sued-for-installing-defeat-devices-in-u-s-diesel-cars) [1]. Other manufacturers of diesel driven cars, for example, Ford Motor Co., Mercedes-Benz, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV, General Motors Co., and Volkswagen, have also produced diesel driven cars with higher levels of environmental pollution caused by sulfur oxides and NOx in exhaust gasses than is permissible. These companies have also met with similar problems and legal accusations. Was all this only the fault of the diesel car manufacturers, or was it perhaps a well-prepared attempt to discredit the diesel cars as they are or maybe the diesel motor as it is? Was it an attempt to favor the electric driven cars by undermining the manufacturers of diesel driving cars, and even possibly by undermining all manufacturers of cars driven by internal combustion engines (ICEs)? Diesel driven vehicles as a type of motor driven means are very powerful and economical and can be environmentally cleaner than other motor driven media, including electrically driven vehicles, if the total pollution produced by such vehicles is taken into account. The total manufacturing pollution from motor driven means, the handling, and the production of the driving force (e.g., benzene, kerosene, gasoline, diesel, and electricity) should all be taken into account. The environmental safety of the utilization of motor driven means and parts thereof after such vehicles have been decommissioned is also a very important consideration. The health hazards and environmental safety associated with the production, handling, and decommissioning must be considered as significant factors in the ranking of motor driven vehicles as a contributor to environmental pollution and health hazards.
机译:由Bayerische Motoren Werke Ak-tiengesellschaft(BMW AG)在2009年至2011年之间制造的X5和335d模型柴油车在新泽西州的美国法院被起诉,其污染比实验室测试更多。宝马(BMW AG)使用类似于大众汽车(Volkswagen AG)认可的作弊机构的测试方法(https://www.bloomberg.comews/articles/2018-03-27/bmw-sued-for-installing-defeat-devices-in -我们的柴油车)[1]。其他柴油驱动车制造商,例如福特汽车公司,梅赛德斯-奔驰,菲亚特克莱斯勒汽车公司,通用汽车公司和大众汽车公司,也生产了由硫氧化物和NOx引起的环境污染水平更高的柴油驱动车。废气中所允许的含量。这些公司也遇到了类似的问题和法律指控。所有这些仅仅是柴油车制造商的错吗,或者是否是准备充分的尝试抹黑了柴油车,或者说是柴油电机?是否通过破坏柴油驾驶汽车的制造商,甚至可能破坏所有由内燃机(ICE)驱动的汽车制造商,来偏爱电动汽车?如果考虑到由柴油驱动的车辆产生的总污染,则该柴油驱动的车辆是非常强大且经济的,并且在环境上比包括电动车辆在内的其他电动机驱动的介质更清洁。应当考虑电动机驱动装置,操纵和驱动力产生的总制造污染(例如苯,煤油,汽油,柴油和电力)。在这种车辆已经退役之后利用电动机驱动装置及其零件的环境安全也是非常重要的考虑因素。与生产,处理和退役相关的健康危害和环境安全必须被视为影响环境污染和健康危害的机动车辆排名的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号