...
首页> 外文期刊>VITAE : Academia Biomédica Digital >Completion Thyroidectomy Versus Total Thyroidectomy: Complication Rates
【24h】

Completion Thyroidectomy Versus Total Thyroidectomy: Complication Rates

机译:完成甲状腺切除术与全甲状腺切除术的并发症发生率

获取原文
           

摘要

Objetives. This study compared our experience with completion thyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy in the management of well-differentiated thyroid cancer. We compared complication rates and analyzed the implications of the intraoperative management of the parathyroid glands. Methods We perfomed a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients undergoing completion thyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy between October 1984 and august 1999. All patients had surgery for either suspected or confirmed well –diffeerentiated thyroid cancer on fine –needle aspiration. Results. A total of 100 completion thyroidectomy and 75 total thyroidectomy were studied. Mean hospital stays were 4,5 and 3.5 days, for the completion thyroidectomy y total thyroidectomy group, respectively (p= 0.001).Temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis occurred in 2% and 6.6% of patients in the completion thyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy group, respectively. There was one case of permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in the completion thyroidectomy. Permanent hypoparathyroidism rates were 5% y 6.6% in the completion thyroidectomy and thyroidectomy total group, respectively. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of total mumbers of parathyroid glands autotransplanted (p=0.63) or present in the specimen (p=0.26). Conclusions. Completion thyroidectomy is a safe and appropriate option in the management of selected cases of well diffferentiated thyroid cancer in which a definitive preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis is not available, but it requires a longer hospitalization, so it has implications for both hospital resources and the patients involved.
机译:物体。这项研究比较了我们在完全分化型甲状腺癌的治疗中与完全甲状腺切除术和全甲状腺切除术的经验。我们比较了并发症发生率,并分析了甲状旁腺的术中处理的意义。方法我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了1984年10月至1999年8月接受全甲状腺切除术和全甲状腺切除术的患者的结局。所有患者均因细针穿刺术而疑似或确诊的高分化甲状腺癌接受了手术。结果。共研究了100例完全甲状腺切除术和75例完全甲状腺切除术。完全甲状腺切除术和完全甲状腺切除术组的平均住院时间分别为4,5和3.5天(p = 0.001)。完全性甲状腺切除术和完全甲状腺切除术组中分别有2%和6.6%的患者发生暂时性喉返神经麻痹,分别。甲状腺切除术中有一例永久性喉返神经麻痹。完全性甲状腺切除术和全甲状腺切除术组的永久性甲状旁腺功能减退率分别为5%y 6.6%。两组之间在自体移植的甲状旁腺的总木材数量(p = 0.63)或标本中存在的总木材数量(p = 0.26)方面没有差异。结论。甲状腺全切除术是治疗某些高度分化的甲状腺癌的安全且适当的选择,这些病例无法进行明确的术前或术中诊断,但需要更长的住院时间,因此对医院资源和患者均具有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号