首页> 外文期刊>Verbum et Ecclesia >Anders lees, sien, praat en glo ? ?n antwoord op ander se lees van ?Om die Bybel anders te lees: ?n Etiek van Bybellees?
【24h】

Anders lees, sien, praat en glo ? ?n antwoord op ander se lees van ?Om die Bybel anders te lees: ?n Etiek van Bybellees?

机译:否则,阅读,看,说和相信?对他人的回答是:阅读吗?以不同的方式阅读圣经:阅读圣经的伦理?

获取原文
       

摘要

To read, see, talk and believe differently ? a response to other readers? reading of ?Om die Bybel anders te lees: ?n Etiek van Bybellees? As any exegesis is necessarily preceded by certain theological convictions, the author of the book Om die Bybel anders te lees: ?n Etiek van Bybellees (2007) responds to criticism on the book flowing from a seminar ? especially the remarks made by Hans van Deventer and Jurie le Roux. Firstly, the ideas on a changed view of the deity are discussed. This conversation is augmented by a discussion of the criticism levelled at the idea that reading the Bible has consequences for other people, and that a different reading would lead to a different concept of God. Van Deventer?s comments regarding the difficulty of debating theological issues are strengthened by a critical discussion of a debate in Die Kerkblad regarding the grammatical-historical method. His critical remarks regarding the value of a historical consciousness are discussed by way of a question on the relationship between a liberal theology and a conservative political point of view. Le Roux?s struggle with Snyman?s utilisation of apartheid as a rhetorical strategy leads the discussion to a recent example of overcoming racism while using unreflectingly racist imagery. This example indicates how theology effects cosmetic changes, without taking on the real issue. For this reason, the author concludes that a critical reading of the own Western tradition in Africa has become necessary.?--- Abstract translated into Sipedi ---Go bala, go bona, go bolela le go dumela ka go fapana - go arabela go balwa ga 'Om die Bybel anders te lees: ?n Etiek van Bybellees' ke babadi ba bangweBjale ka ge go fetleka Bibele go etwa pele ke ditumelo t?a go tiba t?a teologi, mongwadi wa Om die Bybel anders te lees: ?n Etiek van Bybellees (2007) o arabela ditsholo t?a puku ye t?eo di tswet?wego ke seminare ye e fetilego - kudu ditshwayotshwayo t?a Hans van Deventer le Jurie le Roux. Sa pele, go ahlaahlwa dikgopolo t?e fetogilego ka Modimo. Poledi?ano ye e tlat?wa ke go ahlaahla tsholo ye e lebanywago le gore go bala Bibele go na le khuet?o ye itsego go batho ba bangwe, le gore go bala ka tsela ya go fapana go tlo tli?a kgopolo ya go fo?agala ka Modimo. Ditshwayotshwayo t?a Van Deventer mabapi le bothata bja go ngangi?ana ka ditaba t?a teologi di loi?wa ke go ahlaahla ka tsholo ka go Die Kerkblad poledi?ano mabapi le mokgwa wa go hlatholla Bibele ka go sekaseka popopolelo(gramatika) le histori ya tlholego ya yona. Ditshwayotshwayo t?a gagwe mabapi le mohola wa boitemogo bja go tli?wa ke histori di ahlaahlwa ka tsela ya pot?i?o tswalanong ya teologi ya tokologo le kgopolo ya sepoloiki ya go gana diphetogo. Bothata bja Le Roux mabapi le kgopolo ya Snyman ya go re kgethollo go ya ka merafe e ?omi?wa e le tsela ya go t?hela phori mahlong e i?a poledi?ano ye go mohlala wo e sego wa kgale wa go fenya semorafe ka go ?omi?a seswant?hokgopolo sa semorafe sa pepeneng. Mohlala wo o laet?a ka fao teologi e amago diphetogo t?a ka mehla maphelong a batho ntle le go lebanya ditaba t?a paale thwii. Ka lona lebaka leo, mongwadi o ruma ka go re go bala set?o sa batho ba Bodikela mo Afrika ka tshekatsheko le phetleko ya go tiba go tloga go nyakega.--- End of translation ---
机译:读书,看,说话和相信与众不同?对其他读者的回应?读《拜耳·拜贝尔·安德斯·特里斯:难道埃蒂克·范·拜贝尔斯》?既然任何释义都必须先经过某些神学的定罪,所以这本书的作者是Om die Bybel anders te lees:?Etiek van Bybellees(2007)对来自研讨会的对该书的批评作出了回应?特别是Hans van Deventer和Jurie le Roux的讲话。首先,讨论了改变神观的想法。通过对以下批评的讨论,使这种对话得以加强:对阅读圣经会对他人造成后果的观点的批评,而不同的阅读将导致对上帝的不同观念。范·德文特(Dan Kerkblad)关于语法历史方法的辩论的批判性讨论加强了范德文特(Van Deventer)关于辩论神学问题的困难的评论。通过关于自由神学和保守政治观点之间关系的问题,讨论了他关于历史意识价值的批判性言论。勒·鲁克斯(Le Roux)与斯尼曼(Snyman)利用种族隔离作为一种修辞策略的斗争,导致讨论成为最近一个使用种族主义意象克服种族主义的例子。该示例说明了神学如何影响外观变化,而没有考虑实际问题。因此,作者得出结论,有必要对非洲自己的西方传统进行批判性解读。?---摘要翻译成西佩迪---去巴拉,去波娜,去玻利拉去杜梅拉卡去法帕纳-去阿拉贝拉拜瓦尔(Balwa ga)拜拜(Om die Bybel)安德斯(Andy te lees):恩蒂蒂克(Etiek van Bybellees)的ke babadi ba bangweBjale ka ge拜特莱卡(betlele Bietle)埃蒂克·范·拜贝尔斯(Etiek van Bybellees)(2007) Sa pele,去ahlaahlwa dikgopolo t?e fetogilego ka Modimo。 Poledi?ano ye e tlat?wa ke go ahlaahla tsholo ye lebanywago le gore go bala Bibele go na le khuet?o ye itsego go batho ba bangwe,le gore go bala ka tsela ya go fapana go tlo tli?a kgopolo ya go fo?agala ka Modimo。范·德文特(Danthwayotshwayo)和范·德文特(Van Deventer) Le histori ya tlholego ya yona。您可以通过以下方式获得更多信息:我可以在tspot ya pot?i?o tswalanong ya teologi ya tokologo le kgopolo ya sepoloiki ya goana diphetogo上找到更多信息。 Bothata bja Le Roux mabapi le kgopolo ya Snyman ya go re kgethollo go ya ka merafe e?omi?wa e le tsela ya go t?hela phori mahlong ei?可以去看看吗? Mohlala wo o laet?a ka fao teologi e amago diphetogo t?ka mehla maphelong a batho ntle le go lebanya ditaba t?a paale thwii。翻译:---结束于---翻译:---翻译结束---

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号