首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Assessing the effectiveness of Enhanced Psychological Care for patients with depressive symptoms attending cardiac rehabilitation compared with treatment as usual (CADENCE): a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Assessing the effectiveness of Enhanced Psychological Care for patients with depressive symptoms attending cardiac rehabilitation compared with treatment as usual (CADENCE): a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial

机译:与常规治疗相比,评估接受心理康复治疗的抑郁症状患者的增强心理护理的有效性(CADENCE):一项试点性随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Around 17% of people attending UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes have depression. Optimising psychological wellbeing is a rehabilitation goal, but provision of psychological care is limited. We developed and piloted an Enhanced Psychological Care (EPC) intervention embedded within cardiac rehabilitation, aiming to test key areas of uncertainty to inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) and economic evaluation. An external pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) randomised eight cardiac rehabilitation teams (clusters) to either usual care of cardiac rehabilitation provision (UC), or EPC in addition to UC. EPC comprised mental health care coordination and patient-led behavioural activation with nurse support. Adults eligible for cardiac rehabilitation following an acute coronary syndrome and identified with new-onset depressive symptoms during an initial nurse assessment were eligible. Measures were performed at baseline and 5- and 8-month follow-ups and compared between EPC and UC. Team and participant recruitment and retention rates, and participant outcomes (clinical events, depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life, patient experiences, and resource use) were assessed. Eight out of twenty teams were recruited and randomised. Of 614 patients screened, 55 were eligible and 29 took part (5%, 95% CI 3 to 7% of those screened), with 15 patient participants cluster randomised to EPC and 14 to UC. Nurse records revealed that 8/15 participants received the maximum number of EPC sessions offered; and 4/15 received no sessions. Seven out of fifteen EPC participants were referred to another NHS psychological service compared to none in UC. We followed up 27/29 participants at 5 months and 17/21 at 8 months. The mean difference (EPC minus UC) in depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory) at follow-up (adjusting for baseline score) was 1.7 (95% CI ??3.8 to 7.3; N = 26) at 5 months and 4.4 (95% CI ??1.4 to 10.2; N = 17) at 8 months. While valued by patients and nurses, organisational and workload constraints are significant barriers to EPC implementation. There remains a need to develop and test new models of psychological care within cardiac rehabilitation. Our study offers important data to inform the design of future trials of similar interventions. ISRCTN34701576 . Registered on 29 May 2014. Funding details: UK NIHR HTA Programme (project 12/189/09).
机译:参加英国心脏康复计划的人中约有17%患有抑郁症。优化心理健康是康复目标,但提供心理护理的机会有限。我们开发并试行了嵌入心脏康复中的增强型心理护理(EPC)干预措施,旨在测试不确定性的关键领域,从而为确定性随机对照试验(RCT)的设计和经济评估提供依据。外部飞行员随机对照试验(RCT)将八个心脏康复小组(小组)随机分为心脏康复机构(UC)或EPC的常规护理人员。 EPC包括精神保健协调和在护士的支持下以患者为主导的行为激活。有资格在急性冠状动脉综合征后进行心脏康复并在初次护士评估中被确定为新发抑郁症状的成年人是合格的。在基线以及5个月和8个月的随访中进行了测量,并在EPC和UC之间进行了比较。评估了团队和参与者的招募和保留率,以及参与者的结果(临床事件,抑郁,焦虑,与健康相关的生活质量,患者体验和资源使用)。每二十支球队中有八支被招募并随机分配。在614例筛查患者中,有55例符合条件,有29例参与(5%,95%CI 3%至7%),其中15例患者受试者随机分为EPC和14例UC。护士记录显示,有8/15名参与者获得了最多的EPC会议次数;和4/15没有收到任何会议。在15名EPC参与者中,有7名被转介到另一项NHS心理服务,而在UC中则没有。我们在5个月随访了27/29名参与者,在8个月随访了17/21名参与者。随访(根据基线评分调整)后,抑郁症状(贝克抑郁量表)的平均差异(EPC减去UC)在5个月时为1.7(95%CI≥3.8至7.3; N = 26)和4.4(95%)。 8个月时CI为1.4至10.2; N = 17)。虽然受到患者和护士的重视,但组织和工作量限制是实施EPC的重大障碍。仍然需要在心脏康复中开发和测试心理护理的新模型。我们的研究提供了重要的数据,以指导类似干预措施的未来试验设计。 ISRCTN34701576。 2014年5月29日注册。资金细节:英国NIHR HTA计划(项目12/189/09)。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号