...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Comparative effectiveness and economic evaluation of Chuna manual therapy for chronic neck pain: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparative effectiveness and economic evaluation of Chuna manual therapy for chronic neck pain: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

机译:Chuna手动疗法治疗慢性颈部疼痛的比较效果和经济评价:一项多中心随机对照试验的方案

获取原文

摘要

Neck pain is a highly prevalent medical?condition that incurs substantial social burden. Although manual therapy is widely used for treatment of neck pain, the body of evidence supporting its effectiveness and safety is not conclusive. The aim of this study is to examine the effect, safety, and cost-effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy, a?traditional Korean manual therapy?for treatment of various musculoskeletal complaints. This study is the protocol for a two-armed parallel, assessor-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. A total 108 patients with chronic neck pain (time to onset ≥?3?months, numeric rating scale [NRS] of neck pain ≥?5) will be recruited at five Korean medicine hospital sites. Participants will be allotted to one of two groups (n?=?54, respectively): the Chuna manual therapy group, and the?usual care (conventional physical therapy and medication treatment) group. Ten sessions of Chuna manual therapy or usual care will be administered twice a week for five weeks. Since the study design does not permit patient or physician blinding, the outcome assessor and statistician will be blinded. The?primary outcome will be the visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck pain at 5 weeks?after randomization. Secondary outcomes include?the VAS of radiating arm pain, NRS of neck pain and radiating arm pain, Vernon-Mior neck disability index (NDI), Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire (NPQ), EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), EQ-VAS, patient global impression of change (PGIC), economic evaluation, adverse effects, and drug consumption. Follow-up outcome assessments will be conducted at 3, 6, 9, and 12?months after randomization. This study will evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy and usual care on chronic neck pain. Adverse events, and costs and effectiveness (utility) data will be evaluated to assess safety and exploratory cost-effectiveness (economic evaluation). This study aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy. Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0002732 . Registered on 13 March 2018. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03294785 . Registered on 27 September 2017.
机译:颈部疼痛是一种非常普遍的医疗条件,会带来巨大的社会负担。尽管手动疗法已广泛用于治疗颈部疼痛,但支持其有效性和安全性的证据尚无定论。这项研究的目的是检查Chuna手动疗法(一种传统的韩国手动疗法)对各种肌肉骨骼疾病的治疗效果,安全性和成本效益。这项研究是一项两臂平行,评估者盲,多中心,随机对照试验的方案。总共有108名慢性颈痛患者(发病时间≥?3?月,颈痛≥?5的数字量表[NRS])将被招募到五个韩国医院。参加者将被分为两组(分别为n?=?54)之一:Chuna手动治疗组和常规护理(常规物理治疗和药物治疗)组。每周两次进行十次Chuna手动疗法或常规护理,持续五周。由于研究设计不允许患者或医师盲目,因此结果评估者和统计学家将是盲目的。主要结果将是随机分组后第5周颈部疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)。次要结果包括放射臂痛的VAS,颈部疼痛和放射臂痛的NRS,弗农-米尔颈部残疾指数(NDI),诺斯威克公园颈痛问卷(NPQ),EuroQol-5维度(EQ-5D),EQ -VAS,患者对变化的整体印象(PGIC),经济评估,不利影响和药物消耗。随访结果评估将在随机分组后的3、6、9和12个月进行。这项研究将评估Chuna手动疗法和常规护理对慢性颈部疼痛的比较效果。将评估不良事件以及成本和效果(效用)数据,以评估安全性和探索性成本效果(经济评估)。这项研究旨在提供有关Chuna手动疗法的有效性,安全性和成本效益的证据。临床研究信息服务(CRIS),KCT0002732。于2018年3月13日注册。ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03294785。 2017年9月27日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号