...
首页> 外文期刊>The oncologist >Sorafenib With and Without Transarterial Chemoembolization for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Main Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Retrospective Analysis
【24h】

Sorafenib With and Without Transarterial Chemoembolization for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Main Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Retrospective Analysis

机译:索拉非尼伴或不伴经动脉化学栓塞治疗晚期肝细胞癌合并主要门静脉肿瘤血栓形成的回顾性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. The survival benefit of combining sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy compared with sorafenib monotherapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and main portal vein tumor thrombosis (MPVTT) is unclear. Methods. Between January 2009 and June 2013, 183 consecutive patients with advanced HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C) and MPVTT were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 89 patients with advanced HCC and MPVTT were enrolled in this study: 45 were treated with combination therapy (sorafenib-TACE group), and the other 44 treated with sorafenib monotherapy (sorafenib group). Results. The mean number of TACE sessions per patient was 2.6 (range: 1a??5). The median duration of sorafenib in the sorafenib-TACE group and sorafenib group was 5.6 months and 5.4 months, respectively. The disease control rate was similar between the two groups. Median time to progression was 3.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2, 3.7) in the sorafenib-TACE group, and 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.1, 3.8) in the sorafenib group (p = .924). Median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI: 6.1, 7.8) and 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.7, 7.3) in the sorafenib-TACE group and the sorafenib group, respectively (p = .544). The adverse events related to sorafenib were comparable between the two groups. Twenty-one adverse events of grade 3a??4 related to TACE occurred in 12 patients (26.7%), and 2 of them died (4.4%). Conclusion. This study demonstrated no advantage of combination therapy over sorafenib monotherapy. Considering the patientsa?? morbidity after TACE, sorafenib monotherapy is appropriate for managing patients with advanced HCC and MPVTT. Implications for Practice: For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and main portal vein tumor thrombosis (MPVTT), no benefit was seen in this study in terms of disease control rate, time to progression, and overall survival for patients receiving sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization compared with those receiving sorafenib monotherapy. Considering the patientsa?? morbidity after combination therapy, monotherapy is appropriate for managing patients with advanced HCC and MPVTT.
机译:背景。与索拉非尼单药治疗相比,索拉非尼和经动脉化学栓塞(TACE)疗法在晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)和主门静脉肿瘤血栓形成(MPVTT)患者中的生存获益尚不清楚。方法。在2009年1月至2013年6月期间,回顾性分析了183例晚期HCC(巴塞罗那临床肝癌C期)和MPVTT患者。其中,有89例晚期肝癌和MPVTT患者入选本研究:45例接受联合治疗(索拉非尼-TACE组),其余44例接受索拉非尼单药治疗(索拉非尼组)。结果。每位患者的平均TACE疗程为2.6(范围:1a ?? 5)。索拉非尼-TACE组和索拉非尼组索拉非尼的中位持续时间分别为5.6个月和5.4个月。两组的疾病控制率相似。索拉非尼-TACE组的中位进展时间为3.0个月(95%置信区间[CI]:2.2、3.7),索拉非尼组为3.0个月(95%CI:2.1、3.8)(p = .924)。索拉非尼-TACE组和索拉非尼组的中位总生存期分别为7.0个月(95%CI:6.1、7.8)和6.0个月(95%CI:4.7、7.3)(p = .544)。与索拉非尼相关的不良事件在两组之间相当。 12例患者(26.7%)发生了21例与TACE相关的3a?4级不良事件,其中2例死亡(4.4%)。结论。这项研究表明联合治疗比索拉非尼单药治疗没有优势。考虑到病人索非尼单药治疗TACE后的发病率高,适合治疗晚期HCC和MPVTT患者。实践的意义:对于晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)和主门静脉肿瘤血栓形成(MPVTT)的患者,在接受索拉非尼和经动脉治疗的患者的疾病控制率,进展时间和总生存率方面,本研究未见任何益处与接受索拉非尼单药治疗的患者相比,化疗栓塞效果更好。考虑到病人合并治疗后发病率高,单一治疗适合治疗晚期HCC和MPVTT患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号