...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts
【24h】

Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts

机译:重症监护试验摘要的报告:CONSORT摘要指南公布前后的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background An extension of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement provides a checklist of items to improve the reporting quality of s of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, authors of s in some fields have poorly adhered to this guideline. We did an extensive literature survey to examine the quality of reporting trial s in major critical care journals before and after announcement of the CONSORT guideline for s. Methods We reviewed s of RCTs published in four major critical care journals with publication dates ranging from 2006 to 2007 (pre-CONSORT) and from 2011 to 2012 (post-CONSORT): Intensive Care Medicine (ICM), Critical Care (CC), American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (AJRCCM), and Critical Care Medicine (CCM). For each item in the CONSORT guideline for s, we considered that an was well-reported when it reported a relevant item and adhered to the guideline. Our primary outcomes were to describe the proportion of s that adhered to the guideline for each item in each period and the changes between the two periods. Pearson’s chi-square analysis was performed to compare adherence to the guideline between the two periods. Results Our inclusion criteria yielded 185 and 166 s from pre- and post-CONSORT periods, respectively. Less than 50% of s adequately reported trial design (16.3%), participants (44.0%), outcomes in methods (49.4%), randomization (1.8%), blinding (4.2%), numbers randomized (37.4%) and analyzed (8.4%), recruitment (4.2%), outcomes in results (16.9%), harms (27.7%), trial registration (42.2%), and funding (13.9%) in the recent period. There was significant improvement in reporting title, primary outcomes in both methods and results, interventions, harms, trial registration, and funding between the two periods ( p Conclusions Reporting of some items in s for critical care trials improved over time, but the adherence to the CONSORT guideline for s was still suboptimal.
机译:背景合并报告试验标准(CONSORT)声明的扩展提供了一项项目清单,以提高随机对照试验(RCT)的报告质量。但是,在某些领域中,s的作者很少遵循该准则。在发布CONSORT指南之前和之后,我们进行了广泛的文献调查,以检验主要重症监护杂志中报告试验的质量。方法我们回顾了在4种主要重症监护杂志上发表的RCT,其发布日期为2006年至2007年(CONSORT之前)和2011年至2012年(CONSORT之后):重症监护医学(ICM),重症监护(CC),美国呼吸与重症医学杂志(AJRCCM)和重症医学(CCM)。对于CONSORT指南中关于s的每个项目,我们认为an在报告相关项目并遵守该指南时被很好地报告。我们的主要结果是描述每个时期每个项目遵守准则的s的比例以及两个时期之间的变化。进行了Pearson的卡方分析,以比较两个时期之间对准则的遵守情况。结果我们的纳入标准在CONSORT之前和之后分别产生了185和166 s。少于充分报告的试验设计的50%(16.3%),参与者(44.0%),方法结果(49.4%),随机化(1.8%),盲法(4.2%),随机数(37.4%)和分析的( 8.4%),招聘(4.2%),结果(16.9%),危害(27.7%),审判注册(42.2%)和资金(13.9%)。在两个阶段之间,报告标题,方法和结果的主要结局,干预措施,危害,试验注册和资金方面都有显着改善(p结论随着时间的流逝,重症监护试验中某些项目的报告有所改善,但是坚持的CONSORT准则仍然不够理想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号