首页> 外文期刊>Trials >The Ghent Psychotherapy Study (GPS) on the differential efficacy of supportive-expressive and cognitive behavioral interventions in dependent and self-critical depressive patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

The Ghent Psychotherapy Study (GPS) on the differential efficacy of supportive-expressive and cognitive behavioral interventions in dependent and self-critical depressive patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:根特心理疗法研究(GPS)对依赖和自重性抑郁症患者的支持性表达和认知行为干预的差异疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Major depressive disorder is a leading cause of disease burden worldwide, indicating the importance of effective therapies. Outcome studies have shown overall efficacy of different types of psychotherapy across groups, yet large variability within groups. Although patient characteristics are considered crucial in understanding outcome, they have received limited research attention. This trial aims at investigating the interaction between therapeutic approach (pre-structured versus explorative) and the personality style of patients (dependent versus self-critical), which is considered a core underlying dimension of depressive pathology. Methods/design This study is a pragmatic stratified (dependent and self-critical patients) parallel trial with equal randomization (allocation 1:1) conducted in Flanders, Belgium. One hundred and four patients will be recruited and randomized to either 16–20 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression (pre-structured approach) or 16–20 sessions of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression (explorative approach) conducted by trained psychotherapists in private practices. The primary outcome is the severity of depression as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at completion of therapy. Secondary outcome measures include self-reported depressive and other symptoms, interpersonal functioning, idiosyncratic complaints, and the presence of the diagnosis of depression. Additional measures include biological measures, narrative material (sessions, interviews), and health care costs. Discussion This trial presents the test of an often-described, yet hardly investigated interaction between important personality dimensions and therapeutic approach in the treatment of depression. Results could inform therapists on how to match psychotherapeutic treatments to specific personality characteristics of their patients. Trial registration Isrctn.com, ISRCTN17130982 . Registered on 2 February 2015.
机译:背景技术严重的抑郁症是全球疾病负担的主要原因,这表明有效疗法的重要性。结果研究表明,不同类型的心理治疗在各组之间具有整体疗效,但各组之间差异很大。尽管患者特征被认为对理解结局至关重要,但他们受到的研究关注有限。该试验旨在研究治疗方法(预构建与探索)与患者人格风格(依赖与自我批评)之间的相互作用,这被认为是抑郁病理的核心基础。方法/设计本研究是在比利时法兰德斯进行的一项实用,分层(依赖和自我批评的患者),均等随机(分配为1:1)的平行试验。一百零四名患者将被招募并随机分配到由受过训练的心理治疗师在抑郁症中进行的认知行为疗法(预组织方法)16-20次(短期方法)或短期心理动力性心理疗法(探索性方法)16-20次(探索性方法)。私人惯例。主要结局是治疗完成时通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表测量的抑郁严重程度。次要结果指标包括自我报告的抑郁症和其他症状,人际交往的功能,特质性主诉以及存在抑郁症的诊断。其他措施包括生物措施,叙述材料(会议,访谈)和医疗保健费用。讨论该试验介绍了对一种重要的人格维度与抑郁症的治疗方法之间经常被描述但尚未进行研究的相互作用的测试。结果可能会告诉治疗师如何将心理治疗与患者的特定人格特征相匹配。试用注册Isrctn.com,ISRCTN17130982。 2015年2月2日注册。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号