首页> 外文期刊>Trials >DRAPA trial – closed-suction drains versus closed gravity drains in pancreatic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

DRAPA trial – closed-suction drains versus closed gravity drains in pancreatic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:DRAPA试验–胰外科手术中的闭合抽吸引流与闭合重力引流:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The morbidity of pancreatic resection remains high, with pancreatic fistula being the most common cause. The important question is whether any postoperative treatment adjustment may prevent the development of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistulae. Recent studies have shown that intraabdominal drains and manipulation using them are of great importance. Although authors of a few retrospective reports have described good results of pancreatic resection without the use of intraabdominal drains, a recent prospective randomized trial showed that routine elimination of drains in pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with poor outcome. An important issue arises as to which type of drain is most suitable for pancreatic resection. Two types of surgical drains exist: open drains and closed drains. Open drains are considered obsolete nowadays because of frequent retrograde infection. Closed drains include two types: passive gravity drains and closed-suction drains. Closed-suction drains are more effective, as they remove fluid from the abdominal cavity under light pressure. However, some surgeons believe that closed-suction drains represent a potential hazard to patients and that negative pressure might increase the risk of pancreatic fistulae. Nobody has yet specifically dealt with the question of which kind of drainage is most appropriate in pancreatic surgery. Methods/Design The aim of the DRAins in PAncreatic surgery (DRAPA) trial is to compare the closed-suction drain versus the closed passive gravity drain in pancreatic resection. DRAPA is a dual-centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. The primary endpoint is the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula; the secondary endpoint is postoperative morbidity with follow-up of 3 months. Discussion No study to date has compared different types of drains in pancreatic surgery. This study is designed to answer the question whether any particular type of drain might lower the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula or other complications. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01988519 . Registered 13 November 2013.
机译:背景技术胰切除术的发病率仍然很高,胰瘘是最常见的原因。重要的问题是,任何术后治疗调整是否可能阻止临床上重要的术后胰瘘的发展。最近的研究表明,腹腔引流和使用它们的操纵非常重要。尽管一些回顾性报告的作者描述了不使用腹腔引流的胰腺切除术的良好效果,但最近的一项前瞻性随机试验表明,在胰十二指肠切除术中常规消除引流与不良预后相关。哪种类型的引流管最适合胰切除术,这是一个重要的问题。存在两种类型的手术引流管:开放引流管和封闭引流管。由于频繁的逆行感染,如今认为排水沟已经过时了。封闭式排水管包括两种类型:被动重力排水管和封闭式吸水排水管。封闭式排水管更有效,因为它们在轻压力下可以从腹腔中清除液体。但是,一些外科医生认为,闭式引流管会对患者造成潜在危害,负压可能会增加胰瘘的风险。还没有人专门讨论哪种引流最适合胰腺手术的问题。方法/设计DRAins在胰腺外科(DRAPA)试验中的目的是比较胰腺切除术中的闭合抽吸引流与闭合被动重力引流。 DRAPA是一项双中心,前瞻性,随机对照试验。主要终点是术后胰瘘的发生率。次要终点是术后合并症,随访3个月。讨论迄今为止,尚无研究比较胰腺手术中不同类型的引流管。本研究旨在回答以下问题:任何特定类型的引流是否会降低术后胰瘘或其他并发症的发生率。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01988519。 2013年11月13日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号