...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Long-term scar quality after hydrosurgical versus conventional debridement of deep dermal burns (HyCon trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Long-term scar quality after hydrosurgical versus conventional debridement of deep dermal burns (HyCon trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:深水皮肤烧伤与常规清创术相比,水刺手术后长期瘢痕质量(HyCon试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文

摘要

Deep dermal burns require tangential excision of non-viable tissue and skin grafting to improve wound healing and burn-scar quality. Tangential excision is conventionally performed with a knife, but during the last decade hydrosurgery has become popular as a new tool for tangential excision. Hydrosurgery is generally thought to be a more precise and controlled manner of burn debridement leading to preservation of viable tissue and, therefore, better scar quality. Although scar quality is considered to be one of the most important outcomes in burn surgery today, no randomized controlled study has compared the effect of these two common treatment modalities with scar quality as a primary outcome. The aim of this study is, therefore, to compare long-term scar quality after hydrosurgical versus conventional tangential excision in deep dermal burns. A multicenter, randomized, intra-patient, controlled trial will be conducted in the Dutch burn centers of Rotterdam, Beverwijk, and Groningen. All patients with deep dermal burns that require excision and grafting are eligible. Exclusion criteria are: a burn wound 30%, full-thickness burns, chemical or electrical burns, infected wounds (clinical symptoms in combination with positive wound swabs), insufficient knowledge of the Dutch or English language, patients that are unlikely to comply with requirements of the study protocol and follow-up, and patients who are (temporarily) incompetent because of sedation and/or intubation. A total of 137 patients will be included. Comparable wound areas A and B will be appointed, randomized and either excised conventionally with a knife or with the hydrosurgery system. The primary outcome is scar quality measured by the observer score of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS); a subjective scar-assessment instrument, consisting of two separate six-item scales (observer and patient) that are both scored on a 10-point rating scale. This study will contribute to the optimal surgical treatment of patients with deep dermal burn wounds. Dutch Trial Register, NTR6232 . Registered on 23 January 2017.
机译:真皮深层烧伤需要切掉不可行的组织并进行皮肤移植,以改善伤口愈合和烧伤疤痕的质量。切线切除传统上是用刀进行的,但是在最近十年中,水外科已成为切线切除的一种新工具。通常认为水外科手术是烧伤清创术的一种更精确和可控制的方式,可以保存活组织,因此,疤痕质量更好。尽管疤痕质量被认为是当今烧伤手术中最重要的结局之一,但尚无随机对照研究将这两种常见治疗方式的效果与疤痕质量作为主要结果进行比较。因此,本研究的目的是比较深层皮肤烧伤的水刺手术与传统切线手术后的长期疤痕质量。将在荷兰鹿特丹,贝弗威克和格罗宁根的烧伤中心进行一项多中心,随机,患者内,对照试验。所有需要切除和移植的深部皮肤烧伤患者均符合条件。排除标准为:烧伤创面30%,全层烧伤,化学或电灼伤,感染的伤口(临床症状与阳性拭子结合),对荷兰语或英语的了解不足,不太可能符合要求的患者研究方案和随访情况,以及因镇静和/或插管而(暂时)无能力的患者。总共将包括137名患者。伤口区域A和B的可比性将被指定,随机化,或者常规地使用刀或水外科系统切除。主要结果是通过患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)的观察者评分来衡量瘢痕质量;一种主观的疤痕评估工具,包括两个单独的六项量表(观察者和患者),均以10分的评分量表评分。这项研究将有助于深部皮肤烧伤创面的最佳手术治疗。荷兰审判注册簿NTR6232。 2017年1月23日注册。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号