首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Long-term scar quality after hydrosurgical versus conventional debridement of deep dermal burns (HyCon trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Long-term scar quality after hydrosurgical versus conventional debridement of deep dermal burns (HyCon trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:深部皮肤烧伤与常规清创术相比水刺手术后长期瘢痕质量(HyCon试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundDeep dermal burns require tangential excision of non-viable tissue and skin grafting to improve wound healing and burn-scar quality. Tangential excision is conventionally performed with a knife, but during the last decade hydrosurgery has become popular as a new tool for tangential excision. Hydrosurgery is generally thought to be a more precise and controlled manner of burn debridement leading to preservation of viable tissue and, therefore, better scar quality. Although scar quality is considered to be one of the most important outcomes in burn surgery today, no randomized controlled study has compared the effect of these two common treatment modalities with scar quality as a primary outcome. The aim of this study is, therefore, to compare long-term scar quality after hydrosurgical versus conventional tangential excision in deep dermal burns.
机译:背景技术深层皮肤烧伤需要切掉不可行的组织和皮肤移植,以改善伤口愈合和烧伤疤痕的质量。切线切除传统上是用刀进行的,但是在最近十年中,水外科已成为切线切除的一种新工具。通常认为水外科手术是烧伤清创术的一种更精确和可控制的方式,可以保存活组织,因此,疤痕质量更好。尽管疤痕质量被认为是当今烧伤手术中最重要的结果之一,但尚无随机对照研究将这两种常见治疗方式的效果与疤痕质量作为主要结果进行比较。因此,本研究的目的是比较深层皮肤烧伤的水刺手术与常规切线切除后的长期疤痕质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号