...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

机译:社区参与和护理过渡(CIRACT)临床和成本-效果研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Older people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital. Their care compared to younger patients is more challenging, length of stay is longer, risk of hospital-acquired problems higher and the risk of being re-admitted within 28?days greater. This study aims to compare a Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) service with Traditional Hospital Based rehabilitation (THB-Rehab) provided to the older person. The CIRACT service differs from the THB-rehab service in that they are able to provide more intensive hospital rehabilitation, visiting patients daily, and are able to continue with the patient’s rehabilitation following discharge allowing a seamless, integrated discharge working alongside community providers. A pilot comparing the two services showed that the CIRACT service demonstrated reduced length of stay and reduced re-admission rates when analysed over a four-month period. Methods/Design This trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the CIRACT service, conducted as a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an integral qualitative mechanism and action study designed to provide the explanatory and theoretical components on how the CIRACT service compares to current practice. The RCT element consists of 240 patients over 70?years of age, being randomised to either the THB therapy group or the CIRACT service following an unplanned hospital admission. The primary outcome will be hospital length of stay from admission to discharge from the general medical elderly care ward. Additional outcome measures including the Barthel Index, Charlson Co-morbidity Scale, EuroQoL-5D and the modified Client Service Receipt Inventory will be assessed at the time of recruitment and repeated at 91?days post-discharge. The qualitative mechanism and action study will involve a systematic programme of organisational profiling, observations of work processes, interviews with key informants and care providers and tracking of participants. In addition, a within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken comparing the CIRACT and THB-rehab services to determine cost-effectiveness. Discussion The outcome of the study will inform clinical decision-making, with respect to allocation of resources linked to hospital discharge planning and re-admissions, in a resource intensive and growing group of patients. Trial registration Registered with the ISRCTN registry ( ISCRCTN94393315 ) on 25 April 2013 (version 3.1, 11 September 2014).
机译:背景技术老年人占住院患者的很大一部分。与年轻患者相比,他们的护理更具挑战性,住院时间更长,因医院获得问题的风险更高,并且在28天之内再次入院的风险更大。这项研究的目的是将社区入院和护理过渡(CIRACT)服务与向老年人提供的传统医院基础康复(THB-Rehab)进行比较。 CIRACT服务与THB康复服务的不同之处在于,他们能够提供更密集的医院康复服务,每天拜访患者,并能够在出院后继续患者的康复,从而与社区服务提供者无缝,整合地出院。一项对两种服务进行比较的飞行员表明,在四个月的时间内进行分析时,CIRACT服务的住院时间缩短了,重新入院率降低了。方法/设计本试验将评估CIRACT服务的临床和成本效益,该试验以随机对照试验(RCT)进行,具有完整的定性机制和作用研究,旨在为CIRACT服务与以下产品的比较提供解释性和理论性内容目前的做法。 RCT元素由240名70岁以上的患者组成,在计划外的住院治疗后随机分配到THB治疗组或CIRACT服务中。主要结果将是住院时间从一般医疗老年护理病房住院到出院。其他结果指标包括Barthel指数,Charlson合并症量表,EuroQoL-5D和修改后的客户服务收据清单,将在招聘时进行评估,并在出院后91天重复进行。定性机制和行动研究将涉及一个系统的组织概况分析程序,对工作过程的观察,与关键信息提供者和护理提供者的访谈以及对参与者的跟踪。此外,将对CIRACT和THB修复服务进行比较,以进行成本内部的评估。讨论该研究的结果将为资源密集且不断增长的患者群体中与医院出院计划和再入院相关的资源分配提供临床决策依据。试用注册于2013年4月25日(2014年9月11日,版本3.1)在ISRCTN注册中心(ISCRCTN94393315)注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号