首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the Mind–body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the Mind–body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial

机译:补充药物和替代药物与慢性腰痛的常规心理-身体疗法的比较:身心疗法的方案(MAP)随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The self-reported health and functional status of persons with back pain in the United States have declined in recent years, despite greatly increased medical expenditures due to this problem. Although patient psychosocial factors such as pain-related beliefs, thoughts and coping behaviors have been demonstrated to affect how well patients respond to treatments for back pain, few patients receive treatments that address these factors. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addresses psychosocial factors, has been found to be effective for back pain, but access to qualified therapists is limited. Another treatment option with potential for addressing psychosocial issues, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), is increasingly available. MBSR has been found to be helpful for various mental and physical conditions, but it has not been well-studied for application with chronic back pain patients. In this trial, we will seek to determine whether MBSR is an effective and cost-effective treatment option for persons with chronic back pain, compare its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared with CBT and explore the psychosocial variables that may mediate the effects of MBSR and CBT on patient outcomes. Methods/Design In this trial, we will randomize 397 adults with nonspecific chronic back pain to CBT, MBSR or usual care arms (99 per group). Both interventions will consist of eight weekly 2-hour group sessions supplemented by home practice. The MBSR protocol also includes an optional 6-hour retreat. Interviewers masked to treatment assignments will assess outcomes 5, 10, 26 and 52?weeks postrandomization. The primary outcomes will be pain-related functional limitations (based on the Roland Disability Questionnaire) and symptom bothersomeness (rated on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale) at 26?weeks. Discussion If MBSR is found to be an effective and cost-effective treatment option for patients with chronic back pain, it will become a valuable addition to the limited treatment options available to patients with significant psychosocial contributors to their pain. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01467843 .
机译:背景技术尽管由于这一问题而大大增加了医疗支出,但近年来美国在自我报告的背痛患者的健康和功能状况有所下降。尽管已证明患者的心理社会因素(例如与疼痛有关的信念,想法和应对行为)会影响患者对背部疼痛的治疗效果,但很少有患者接受针对这些因素的治疗。研究发现,针对心理社会因素的认知行为疗法(CBT)可有效治疗背痛,但获得合格治疗师的机会有限。基于正念减压(MBSR)的另一种可能解决心理社会问题的治疗选择正在日益普及。已经发现MBSR对于各种精神和身体状况是有帮助的,但是对于用于慢性背痛患者的应用尚未进行充分的研究。在该试验中,我们将寻求确定MBSR对于慢性腰痛患者是否是一种有效且具有成本效益的治疗方案,将其与CBT进行比较,比较其有效性和成本效益,并探讨可能介导MBSR和治疗的心理社会变量。关于患者预后的CBT。方法/设计在该试验中,我们将397例非特异性慢性腰背痛成人随机分为CBT,MBSR或常规护理组(每组99个)。两种干预措施将包括八个每周一次的2小时小组会议,并辅以家庭实践。 MBSR协议还包括可选的6小时撤退。对治疗任务不了解的访调员将评估随机化后5、10、26和52周的结果。主要结果将是在26周时与疼痛相关的功能受限(基于Roland残疾问卷)和症状困扰(以0至10的数字评分量表评分)。讨论如果发现MBSR是对慢性背痛患者的一种有效且具有成本效益的治疗选择,它将对那些对疼痛产生重大社会心理影响的患者可用的有限治疗选择成为有价值的补充。试用注册Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01467843。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号