首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Comparison of an interactive with a didactic educational intervention for improving the evidence-based practice knowledge of occupational therapists in the public health sector in South Africa: a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Comparison of an interactive with a didactic educational intervention for improving the evidence-based practice knowledge of occupational therapists in the public health sector in South Africa: a randomised controlled trial

机译:互动与教学教育干预措施的比较,以改善南非公共卫生部门职业治疗师的循证实践知识:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Despite efforts to identify effective interventions to implement evidence-based practice (EBP), uncertainty remains. Few existing studies involve occupational therapists or resource-constrained contexts. This study aimed to determine whether an interactive educational intervention (IE) was more effective than a didactic educational intervention (DE) in improving EBP knowledge, attitudes and behaviour at 12 weeks. Methods A matched pairs design, randomised controlled trial was conducted in the Western Cape of South Africa. Occupational therapists employed by the Department of Health were randomised using matched-pair stratification by type (clinician or manager) and knowledge score. Allocation to an IE or a DE was by coin-tossing. A self-report questionnaire (measuring objective knowledge and subjective attitudes) and audit checklist (measuring objective behaviour) were completed at baseline and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was EBP knowledge at 12 weeks while secondary outcomes were attitudes and behaviour at 12 weeks. Data collection occurred at participants’ places of employment. Audit raters were blinded, but participants and the provider could not be blinded. Results Twenty-one of 28 pairs reported outcomes, but due to incomplete data for two participants, 19 pairs were included in the analysis. There was a median increase of 1.0 points (95% CI?=?-4.0, 1.0) in the IE for the primary outcome (knowledge) compared with the DE, but this difference was not significant (P?=?0.098). There were no significant differences on any of the attitude subscale scores. The median 12-week audit score was 8.6 points higher in the IE (95% CI?=?-7.7, 27.0) but this was not significant (P?=?0.196). Within-group analyses showed significant increases in knowledge in both groups (IE: T?=?4.0, P P?=?0.002) but no significant differences in attitudes or behaviour. Conclusions The results suggest that the interventions had similar outcomes at 12 weeks and that the interactive component had little additional effect. Trial registration Pan African Controlled Trials Register PACTR201201000346141 , registered 31 January 2012. Clinical Trials NCT01512823 , registered 1 February 2012. South African National Clinical Trial Register DOH2710093067 , registered 27 October 2009. The first participants were randomly assigned on 16 July 2008.
机译:背景尽管尽力确定有效的干预措施以实施循证实践(EBP),但不确定性仍然存在。现有的研究很少涉及职业治疗师或资源受限的情况。这项研究旨在确定在12周时,互动式教育干预(IE)在提高EBP知识,态度和行为方面是否比教学教育干预(DE)更有效。方法在南非西开普省进行配对设计,随机对照试验。卫生署聘用的职业治疗师根据类型(临床医生或管理人员)和知识得分,使用配对配对分层。通过投币分配给IE或DE。在基线和12周时完成了一份自我报告调查表(测量客观知识和主观态度)和审计清单(测量客观行为)。主要结果是12周时的EBP知识,次要结果是12周时的态度和行为。数据收集发生在参与者的工作地点。审计评分者是盲目的,但参与者和提供者不能盲目。结果28对中有21对报告了结果,但是由于两名参与者的数据不完整,因此分析中包括了19对。与DE相比,IE的主要结局(知识)中位数增加1.0点(95%CI≥=-4.0,1.0),但这种差异并不显着(P≥0.098)。在任何态度分量表得分上都没有显着差异。 IE中的12周审核中位数得分高8.6分(95%CI?=-7.7,27.0),但这并不显着(P?=?0.196)。组内分析显示两组的知识都有显着增加(IE:T?=?4.0,P P?=?0.002),但态度或行为没有显着差异。结论结果表明,干预措施在第12周时具有相似的结果,并且互动部分几乎没有其他效果。试验注册泛非对照试验注册簿PACTR201201000346141,2012年1月31日注册。临床试验NCT01512823,注册于2012年2月1日。南非国家临床试验注册簿DOH2710093067,注册于2009年10月27日。第一批参与者于2008年7月16日被随机分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号