首页> 外文期刊>Trials >The SURV1VE trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
【24h】

The SURV1VE trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

机译:SURV1VE试验-窒息新生儿心肺复苏期间持续的通气和胸部按压与3:1的胸部按压-通气比:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

The need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often unexpected, and the infrequent use of CPR in the delivery room (DR) limits the opportunity to perform rigorous clinical studies to determine the best method for delivering chest compression (CC) to newborn infants. The current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend using a coordinated 3:1 compression-to-ventilation (C:V) ratio (CC at a rate of 90/min and ventilations at a rate of 30/min). In comparison, providing CC during a sustained inflation (SI) (CC?+?SI) significantly improved hemodynamics, minute ventilation, and time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) compared to 3:1 C:V ratio in asphyxiated piglets. Similarly, a small pilot trial in newborn infants showed similar results. Until now no study has examined different CC techniques during neonatal resuscitation in asphyxiated newborn infants in the DR. To date, no trial has been performed to directly compare CC?+?SI and 3:1 C:V ratio in the DR during CPR of asphyxiated newborn infants. This is a large, international, multi-center, prospective, unblinded, cluster randomized controlled trial in asphyxiated newborn infants at birth. All term and preterm infants ?28+?0 by best obstetrical estimate who require CPR at birth due to bradycardia ( 28+?0 weeks’ gestational age with bradycardia (?60/min) or asystole immediately after birth who receive either CC?+?SI or 3:1 C:V ratio as the CPR strategy. Morbidity and mortality rates are extremely high for newborns requiring CC. We believe the combination of simultaneous CC and SI during CPR has the potential to significantly improve ROSC and survival. In addition, we believe that CC?+?SI might improve respiratory and hemodynamic parameters and potentially minimize morbidity and mortality in newborn infants. In addition, this will be the first randomized controlled trial to examine CC in the newborn period.
机译:心肺复苏(CPR)的需求通常是出乎意料的,并且分娩室(DR)很少使用CPR限制了进行严格的临床研究以确定向婴儿提供胸腔按压(CC)的最佳方法的机会。当前的新生儿复苏指南建议使用3:1的压缩通气比(C:V)(CC以90 / min的速率和通气以30 / min的速率)。相比之下,与窒息仔猪的C:V比为3:1相比,在持续充气(SI)(CC≥+ SI)期间提供CC可以显着改善血液动力学,微通气和恢复自发循环(ROSC)的时间。同样,一项针对婴儿的小型先导试验显示了相似的结果。迄今为止,尚无研究在DR窒息新生儿中进行新生儿复苏时检查过不同的CC技术。迄今为止,还没有进行过直接比较窒息新生儿CPR期间DR中CCα+βSI和3:1 C:V比的试验。这是一项针对窒息新生儿的大型,国际性,多中心,前瞻性,无盲,整群随机对照试验。最佳产科评估中所有≥28+?0的足月和早产儿,由于心动过缓(出生后立即出现心动过缓的胎龄≥28+?0周(<?60 / min)或刚出生后的心搏停止而需要进行心肺复苏术?+ SI或C:V比为3:1作为CPR策略,需要CC的新生儿的发病率和死亡率极高,我们相信在CPR期间同时使用CC和SI可以显着改善ROSC和生存率。此外,我们相信CC?+?SI可能会改善新生儿的呼吸和血液动力学参数,并可能使新生儿的发病率和死亡率降到最低,此外,这将是第一个在新生儿期检查CC的随机对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号