首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Rationale and design of PASSAT — patients’ satisfaction with local or general anaesthesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with a non-randomised side arm
【24h】

Rationale and design of PASSAT — patients’ satisfaction with local or general anaesthesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with a non-randomised side arm

机译:PASSAT的原理和设计-患者在电视胸腔镜手术中对局部或全身麻醉的满意度:采用非随机侧臂的随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Although general anaesthesia (GA) with one-lung ventilation is the current standard of care, minor thoracoscopic surgery, i.e. treatment of pleural effusions, biopsies and small peripheral pulmonary wedge resections, can also be performed using local anaesthesia (LA), analgosedation and spontaneous breathing. Whilst the feasibility and safety of LA have been demonstrated, its impact on patient satisfaction remains unclear. Most studies evaluating patient satisfaction lack control groups or do not meet psychometric criteria. We report the design of the PASSAT trial (PAtientS’ SATisfaction in thoracic surgery – general vs. local anaesthesia), a randomised controlled trial with a non-randomised side arm. Patients presenting for minor thoracoscopic surgery and physical eligibility for GA and LA are randomised to surgery under GA (control group) or LA (intervention group). Those who refuse to be randomised are asked to attend the study on the basis of their own choice of anaesthesia (preference arm) and will be analysed separately. The primary endpoint is patient satisfaction according to a psychometrically validated questionnaire; secondary endpoints are complication rates, capnometry, actual costs and cost effectiveness. The study ends after inclusion of 54 patients in each of the two randomised study groups. The PASSAT study is the first randomised controlled trial to systematically assess patients’ satisfaction depending on LA or GA. The study follows an interdisciplinary approach, and its results may also be applicable to other surgical disciplines. It is also the first cost study based on randomised samples. Comparison of the randomised and the non-randomised groups may contribute to satisfaction research. German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00013661 . Registered on 23 March 2018.
机译:尽管目前采用单肺通气进行全身麻醉(GA)是目前的护理标准,但也可以使用局部麻醉(LA),自体麻醉和自发进行小规模的胸腔镜手术,即胸腔积液,活检和小范围肺楔形切除术呼吸。尽管已经证明了LA的可行性和安全性,但其对患者满意度的影响仍不清楚。大多数评估患者满意度的研究缺乏对照组或不符合心理测验标准。我们报告了P​​ASSAT试验的设计(胸腔手术中患者的SATisfaction –全身麻醉与局部麻醉),这是一项随机对照试验,无侧臂。进行小型胸腔镜手术并有资格获得GA和LA资格的患者被随机分配至GA(对照组)或LA(干预组)进行手术。那些拒绝接受随机分组的患者将根据自己选择的麻醉方式(首选手臂)参加研究,并将分别进行分析。主要终点是根据心理学计量的调查问卷得出的患者满意度。次要终点是并发症发生率,二氧化碳测定法,实际成本和成本效益。在两个随机研究组的每组中纳入54位患者后,研究结束。 PASSAT研究是第一个根据LA或GA系统评估患者满意度的随机对照试验。该研究遵循跨学科方法,其结果也可能适用于其他外科学科。这也是基于随机样本的第一个成本研究。比较随机组和非随机组可能有助于满意度研究。德国临床试验注册证(DRKS00013661)。 2018年3月23日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号