首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Effect of percutaneous assisted approach on functional rehabilitation for total hip replacement compared to anterolateral approach: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Effect of percutaneous assisted approach on functional rehabilitation for total hip replacement compared to anterolateral approach: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:与前外侧入路相比,经皮辅助入路对全髋关节置换功能康复的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The anterolateral approach is a commonly used technique for total hip replacement. It requires the detachment of a large part of the gluteus medius muscle. However, it is known that this muscle has a great impact on hip stability. Using the percutaneous assisted approach the damage to the gluteus medius can be limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of the percutaneous assisted approach with the anterolateral approach on postoperative functional outcome. Methods/Design This study uses a prospective, randomized, parallel-group design with blinded assessment and unblinded treatment to compare the percutaneous assisted approach with the anterolateral approach in total hip replacement surgery. The postoperative results of patients operated on using the percutaneous assisted approach will be compared with those of patients operated on using the anterolateral approach. Prior to surgery patients will undergo baseline measurements. These will consist of gluteus medius measurements (surface-electromyography, strength measurements of abductors and quadriceps and the Trendelenburg test), questionnaires (Oxford Hip Score and 36-item Short Form Health Survey) and functional measures (the Timed Get-Up-and-Go test, Five times Sit-to-Stand test and Six-Minute Walk test). These measurements will be repeated four and 12 weeks after surgery. After surgery both groups will receive usual care. Discussion The gluteus medius is the main stabilizer of the hip joint. Therefore, we assume that functional outcome and gluteus medius function of patients after the percutaneous assisted approach will be better than after the anterolateral approach. Trial registration This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 8 January 2014, registration number: NCT02032017 .
机译:背景技术前外侧入路是全髋关节置换术的常用技术。它需要使臀中肌的大部分脱离。但是,已知该肌肉对髋部稳定性有很大的影响。使用经皮辅助方法可以限制对臀中肌的损害。本研究的目的是比较经皮辅助入路与前外侧入路对术后功能结局的影响。方法/设计本研究采用前瞻性,随机,平行组设计,并进行盲法评估和无盲法治疗,以比较全髋关节置换手术中经皮辅助方法与前外侧方法的比较。将采用经皮辅助方法手术的患者与采用前外侧方法手术的患者的术后结果进行比较。手术之前,患者将接受基线测量。这些将包括臀肌测量(表面肌电图,外展肌和股四头肌的强度测量以及特伦德伦伯卧位测试),问卷(牛津髋关节评分和36项简短形式健康调查)和功能性测量(定时起床和进行测试,五次静坐测试和六分钟步行测试)。手术后四周和十二周将重复这些测量。手术后,两组都将接受常规护理。讨论臀中肌是髋关节的主要稳定器。因此,我们认为经皮辅助手术后患者的功能结局和臀中肌功能要比前外侧入路后更好。试验注册该试验已于2014年1月8日在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册号:NCT02032017。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号