首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Yoga vs. physical therapy vs. education for chronic low back pain in predominantly minority populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Yoga vs. physical therapy vs. education for chronic low back pain in predominantly minority populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:在少数族裔人群中,瑜伽,物理疗法和教育对慢性下腰痛的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Chronic low back pain causes substantial morbidity and cost to society while disproportionately impacting low-income and minority adults. Several randomized controlled trials show yoga is an effective treatment. However, the comparative effectiveness of yoga and physical therapy, a common mainstream treatment for chronic low back pain, is unknown. Methods/Design This is a randomized controlled trial for 320 predominantly low-income minority adults with chronic low back pain, comparing yoga, physical therapy, and education. Inclusion criteria are adults 18–64?years old with non-specific low back pain lasting ≥12?weeks and a self-reported average pain intensity of ≥4 on a 0–10 scale. Recruitment takes place at Boston Medical Center, an urban academic safety-net hospital and seven federally qualified community health centers located in diverse neighborhoods. The 52-week study has an initial 12-week Treatment Phase where participants are randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio into i) a standardized weekly hatha yoga class supplemented by home practice; ii) a standardized evidence-based exercise therapy protocol adapted from the Treatment Based Classification method, individually delivered by a physical therapist and supplemented by home practice; and iii) education delivered through a self-care book. Co-primary outcome measures are 12-week pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale and back-specific function measured using the modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. In the subsequent 40-week Maintenance Phase, yoga participants are re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either structured maintenance yoga classes or home practice only. Physical therapy participants are similarly re-randomized to either five booster sessions or home practice only. Education participants continue to follow recommendations of educational materials. We will also assess cost effectiveness from the perspectives of the individual, insurers, and society using claims databases, electronic medical records, self-report cost data, and study records. Qualitative data from interviews will add subjective detail to complement quantitative data. Trial registration This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, with the ID number: NCT01343927 .
机译:背景技术慢性腰背痛导致大量发病和社会成本,同时对低收入和少数民族成年人造成不成比例的影响。几项随机对照试验表明,瑜伽是一种有效的治疗方法。但是,瑜伽和物理疗法(一种用于治疗慢性下腰痛的常见主流疗法)的相对有效性尚不清楚。方法/设计这是一项针对320名以慢性腰背痛为主的低收入少数民族成年人的随机对照试验,比较了瑜伽,物理疗法和教育程度。纳入标准为18-64岁的成年人,持续时间≥12周的非特异性下背痛,自我报告的平均疼痛强度在0-10范围内≥4。招聘地点在波士顿医疗中心,城市学术安全网医院和分布在不同社区的七个联邦合格社区卫生中心。这项为期52周的研究有一个为期12周的初始治疗阶段,其中参与者按2:2:1的比例被随机分为以下几个阶段: ii)改编自基于治疗的分类方法的标准化循证运动疗法方案,由理疗师单独提供并以家庭实践为补充; iii)通过一本自理书籍进行教育。共同主要结局指标是使用11点数字评分量表测量的12周疼痛强度,以及使用改良的Roland Morris残疾问卷调查的背部特定功能。在随后的40周维护阶段中,瑜伽参与者将以1:1的比例重新随机分配到结构化的维护瑜伽班或家庭练习中。物理治疗参与者也同样被随机分配到五个强化训练或家庭练习中。教育参与者继续遵循教育材料的建议。我们还将使用索赔数据库,电子病历,自我报告成本数据和研究记录,从个人,保险人和社会的角度评估成本效益。来自访谈的定性数据将增加主观细节,以补充定量数据。试验注册该临床试验在ClinicalTrials.gov中进行了注册,其ID号为:NCT01343927。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号