...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >A cost-effectiveness analysis of provider and community interventions to improve the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Nigeria: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

A cost-effectiveness analysis of provider and community interventions to improve the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Nigeria: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:提供者和社区干预措施的成本效益分析,以改善尼日利亚单纯性疟疾的治疗:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background There is mounting evidence of poor adherence by health service personnel to clinical guidelines for malaria following a symptomatic diagnosis. In response to this, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that in all settings clinical suspicion of malaria should be confirmed by parasitological diagnosis using microscopy or Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT). The Government of Nigeria plans to introduce RDTs in public health facilities over the coming year. In this context, we will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two interventions designed to support the roll-out of RDTs and improve the rational use of ACTs. It is feared that without supporting interventions, non-adherence will remain a serious impediment to implementing malaria treatment guidelines. Methods/design A three-arm stratified cluster randomized trial is used to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of: (1) provider malaria training intervention versus expected standard practice in malaria diagnosis and treatment; (2) provider malaria training intervention plus school-based intervention versus expected standard practice; and (3) the combined provider plus school-based intervention versus provider intervention alone. RDTs will be introduced in all arms of the trial. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients attending facilities that report a fever or suspected malaria and receive treatment according to malaria guidelines. This will be measured by surveying patients (or caregivers) as they exit primary health centers, pharmacies, and patent medicine dealers. Cost-effectiveness will be presented in terms of the primary outcome and a range of secondary outcomes, including changes in provider and community knowledge. Costs will be estimated from both a societal and provider perspective using standard economic evaluation methodologies. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01350752
机译:背景技术越来越多的证据表明,在对症诊断后,卫生服务人员对疟疾临床指南的依从性较差。对此,世界卫生组织(WHO)建议,在所有情况下,均应通过使用显微镜或快速诊断测试(RDT)进行的寄生虫学诊断来确诊疟疾。尼日利亚政府计划在来年将RDTs引入公共卫生设施。在这种情况下,我们将评估旨在支持RDT推广和改善ACTs合理使用的两种干预措施的有效性和成本效益。人们担心,如果不支持干预措施,不遵守将仍然严重阻碍实施疟疾治疗准则。方法/设计采用三臂分层整群随机试验来比较以下方面的有效性和成本效益:(1)提供者疟疾培训干预与预期的疟疾诊断和治疗标准实践; (2)提供者疟疾培训干预加上校本干预与预期的标准实践; (3)合并的提供者加上学校干预与单独提供者干预的组合。将在试验的所有方面引入RDT。主要结局是报告有发烧或疑似疟疾并根据疟疾指南接受治疗的患者所占的比例。这将通过对患者(或护理人员)离开初级保健中心,药房和专利药经销商的调查进行测量。成本效益将根据主要结果和一系列次要结果来表示,包括提供者和社区知识的变化。费用将使用标准的经济评估方法从社会和提供者的角度进行估算。试用注册Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01350752

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号