首页> 外文期刊>Translational Neurodegeneration >A survey of impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease patients in Shanghai area and literature review
【24h】

A survey of impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease patients in Shanghai area and literature review

机译:上海地区帕金森病患者冲动控制障碍调查及文献复习

获取原文
           

摘要

Levodopa and dopamine agonists are the main treatments for Parkinson’s disease (PD) in recent years. Increased drug dosages are linked to some severe side effects, one of which is impulse control disorders (ICD). Many studies have reported the related risk factors of ICDs, such as?dopamine agonist, male sex, younger age, earlier age of onset and so on. This study aims to investigate the incidence of ICD in Chinese PD patients from Shanghai area, explore the association of ICD with dopamine replacement therapy (DRT). Two hundred seventeen PD patients were consecutively recruited from the Movement Disorder Clinic of Ruijin Hospital from March to October 2013. Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview was used to assess the PD patients. PD patients with possible ICD would undergo a further interview by a movement disorder specialist to confirm the diagnosis. Clinical information was also collected. Nine PD patients (4.15?%) showed ICD behaviors as follows: hypersexuality (4, 1.84?%), pathological gambling (3, 1.38?%), binge eating (1, 0.46?%), compulsive shopping (1, 0.46?%). Compared with the non-ICD PD group, ICD PD group took more dopamine agonists (LED 119.4?±?86.4?mg/d vs 60.5?±?80.5?mg/d, P?=?0.019), had higher total levodopa equivalent dosage (TLED 912.81?±?878.73?mg/d vs 503.78?±?359.14?mg/d, P?=?0.031), and had higher H&Y stage (2.33?±?0.87 vs 1.41?±?0.52, p?=?0.013). However, logistic regression analysis didn’t reveal the above factors as independent risk factors of ICD behaviors in our study. The incidence of ICDs behaviors in PD patients in our study is much lower than in western countries. ICD-PD group took higher dopamine agonists and higher total levodopa equivalent dosage, even though logistic regression analysis didn’t reveal them as independent risk factors.
机译:左旋多巴和多巴胺激动剂是近年来治疗帕金森氏病(PD)的主要方法。药物剂量增加与一些严重的副作用有关,其中之一是冲动控制障碍(ICD)。许多研究报道了ICD的相关危险因素,如多巴胺激动剂,男性,年龄较小,发病年龄较早等。本研究旨在调查上海地区中国PD患者中ICD的发生率,探讨ICD与多巴胺替代疗法(DRT)的关联。 2013年3月至10月,连续从瑞金医院运动障碍诊所招募了217名PD患者。采用明尼苏达州冲动障碍访谈法对PD患者进行评估。可能患有ICD的PD患者将接受运动障碍专家的进一步采访以确认诊断。还收集了临床信息。 9名PD患者(4.15%)表现出以下ICD行为:性欲过高(4,1.84%),病理性赌博(3,1.38%),暴饮暴食(1,0.46%),强迫性购物(1,0.46%)。 %)。与非ICD PD组相比,ICD PD组服用更多的多巴胺激动剂(LED 119.4±±86.4μmg/ d相对于60.5±±80.5μmg/ d,P≥= 0.019),总左旋多巴当量较高剂量(TLED 912.81?±?878.73?mg / d与503.78?±?359.14?mg / d,P?=?0.031),并且H&Y阶段较高(2.33?±?0.87对1.41?±?0.52,p? =?0.013)。但是,在我们的研究中,逻辑回归分析并未发现上述因素是ICD行为的独立危险因素。在我们的研究中,PD患者中ICD行为的发生率远低于西方国家。 ICD-PD组服用了更高的多巴胺激动剂和更高的左旋多巴当量总剂量,即使Logistic回归分析并未发现它们是独立的危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号