首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine >Dilemma In Rapid Sequence Intubation: Succinylcholine Vs. Rocuronium
【24h】

Dilemma In Rapid Sequence Intubation: Succinylcholine Vs. Rocuronium

机译:快速插管的难题:琥珀酰胆碱vs。罗库溴铵

获取原文
       

摘要

Succinylcholine is the single ultra-short acting depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) used in the rapid sequence intubation protocol with its rapid onset of effect, complete reliability, short duration of action. Rocuronium is diverse from other non-depolarizing NMBA being the first one with a short onset time and devoid of untoward effects. Despite its widespread use, succinylcholine has several potential hazards including an increase in potassium levels, bradycardia for children and prolonged apnea for those with pseudocholinesterase deficiency. Rocuronium is indicated in subjects with disease states such as known or suspected hyperkalemia, crush injury, non-acute burns, increased intracranial or intraocular pressure and neuromuscular disease.Although succinylcholine has many side effects, it remains to be the first-choice NMBA for the majority of attempts for rapid sequence intubation. Rocuronium may be a suitable alternative to succinylcholine with its short onset time.The objective of this article is to update data from studies comparing the use of succinylcholine and rocuronium in rapid sequence intubation protocol in adults. Introduction Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is developed to secure the airway of a critically ill or injured patient rapidly and safely. RSI applies to virtually all attempts for endotracheal intubation (ETI) in the emergency departments (ED) except for arrest situations. RSI is particularly preferred for ED use because of the simultaneous onset of sedation, paralysis and minimizing the risk of aspiration (1). After being launched in the late seventies, the procedure has been dynamically changing in time with introduction of many newer and advantageous agents (2,3,4).RSI protocol is still in development in order to minimize the risk of aspiration of gastric contents in case of “full stomach” while preventing secondary brain injury via rendering unconsciousness and paralysis and to achieve higher rates of successful ETI.Laryngoscopy and ETI are performed after administering rapid and short-acting sedative, hypnotic and amnestic agents in conjunction with neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) (5). Short-acting agents like succinylcholine (SCh) are generally preferred for fear of protracted intubation failure (5,6). For decades, SCh used to be the sole agent demonstrated to consistently provide paralysis in less than one minute (7,8,9). It is still the sole depolarizing NMBA used in the procedure. It is particularly useful in the critically ill or injured with a full stomach for whom a RSI technique is needed (10). Patients intubated in emergent conditions generally have full stomach and rapid intubation is critical to prevent aspiration of gastric contents. SCh provides a means for rapid intubation in these high-risk patients. Rocuronium (RCR) is diverse from other non-depolarizing NMBA being the first one with a short onset time devoid of adverse effects. The objective of this article is to review all prospective studies comparing the use of SCh and RCR in RSI protocol in adults. Clinical And Pharmacological Properties Of Each Agent Introduced in 1952, SCh depolarizes the neuromuscular membrane and is structurally consisted of two acetylcholine molecules. It acts as a false transmitter of acetylcholine by avidly binding to postsynaptic cholinergic receptors, resulting in persistent depolarization and paralysis (10). This action is associated with muscle fasciculation which can lead to increased intracranial and intragastric pressures. The molecule is rapidly hydrolyzed by serine pseudocholinesterase. SCh is rapidly active within 60 seconds of administration by IV bolus. The clinical duration of action is 3 to 10 minutes and normal neuromuscular function returns within 15 minutes. The first report on the administration of SCh for performing ETI in multiple cases in the ED was published by Thompson et al in 1982 (11).Prolonged or repeated use may augment its effects at vagal or sympathetic
机译:琥珀酰胆碱是快速序列插管方案中使用的单一超短效去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBA),具有起效快,完全可靠,作用时间短的特点。 Rocuronium有别于其他非去极化NMBA,它是第一种起效时间短且没有不良影响的药物。尽管琥珀酰胆碱被广泛使用,但它仍具有多种潜在的危害,包括钾水平升高,儿童心动过缓和假性胆碱酯酶缺乏症的呼吸暂停延长。罗库溴铵适用于患有以下疾病的受试者:已知或疑似高钾血症,挤压伤,非急性烧伤,颅内或眼压升高和神经肌肉疾病。尽管琥珀酰胆碱有许多副作用,但它仍然是首选的NMBA。快速序列插管的大多数尝试。 Rocuronium可能起效时间短,可能是琥珀胆碱的合适替代品。本文的目的是更新比较成人快速序列插管方案中使用琥珀胆碱和罗库溴铵的研究数据。简介开发快速序列插管(RSI)是为了快速安全地保护危重患者或受伤患者的气道。除了逮捕情况外,RSI几乎适用于急诊部门(ED)的所有气管插管尝试(ETI)。 RSI特别适合用于ED,因为它同时具有镇静作用,麻痹作用和最小的误吸风险(1)。自七十年代末启动以来,该程序已随着时间的推移而动态变化,引入了许多新的和有利的药物(2,3,4)。RSI协议仍在开发中,目的是最大程度地减少吸入胃内容物的风险。 “全胃”的情况,同时通过使意识丧失和麻痹防止继发性脑损伤,并获得更高的ETI成功率。在同时使用速效和短效镇静剂,催眠药和记忆消除剂以及神经肌肉阻滞剂后,进行喉镜检查和ETI检查( NMBA)(5)。通常首选短效药物,例如琥珀酰胆碱(SCh),因为这样会延长插管失败的可能性(5,6)。几十年来,SCh一直是唯一证明在不到一分钟的时间内始终能够麻痹的唯一药物(7,8,9)。它仍然是手术中使用的唯一的去极化NMBA。它对于需要RSI技术的重症患者或饱食的胃特别有用(10)。在紧急情况下插管的患者通常会有饱满的胃,快速插管对于防止胃内容物的抽吸至关重要。 SCh为这些高危患者提供了快速插管的方法。罗库溴铵(RCR)有别于其他非去极化NMBA,它是第一种起效时间短,无副作用的药物。本文的目的是回顾所有前瞻性研究,以比较SCh和RCR在成人RSI方案中的使用。每种药物的临床和药理特性1952年推出的SCh使神经肌肉膜去极化,并在结构上由两个乙酰胆碱分子组成。通过与突触后胆碱能受体的狂热结合,它成为乙酰胆碱的错误传递者,导致持续去极化和瘫痪(10)。该动作与肌肉束缚有关,其可能导致颅内和胃内压力增加。该分子被丝氨酸假胆碱酯酶迅速水解。 SCh在静脉推注后60秒钟内迅速活跃。临床作用时间为3至10分钟,正常的神经肌肉功能在15分钟内恢复。 Thompson等人于1982年发表了有关在多例急诊室中多用ECh进行SCh的管理的首次报道(11),长期或反复使用可能会增强其对迷走神经或交感神经的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号