...
首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco Induced Diseases >Initial puffing behaviors and subjective responses differ between an electronic nicotine delivery system and traditional cigarettes
【24h】

Initial puffing behaviors and subjective responses differ between an electronic nicotine delivery system and traditional cigarettes

机译:电子尼古丁传送系统和传统香烟之间的初始抽吸行为和主观反应有所不同

获取原文

摘要

Background Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) present an emerging issue for tobacco control and data on product use behaviors are limited. Methods Participants (N = 38 enrolled; N = 16 compliant) completed three lab visits over 5 days and were asked to abstain from regular cigarettes for 72 hours in favor of ENDS (Smoke 51 TRIO – 3 piece, First Generation with 11 mg/ml filters). Lab visits included measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and salivary cotinine concentration, questionnaire measures of regular cigarette craving after the 72 hour abstinence, and subjective product effects. Participants used a topography device to record puff volume, duration, flow rate, and inter-puff interval. Results Analyses revealed significant differences across products in puff count, average volume, total volume and inter-puff interval, with ENDS broadly showing a more intensive smoking pattern. Cigarette craving scores dropped significantly after smoking regular cigarettes, but not ENDS (p?=?.001), and subjective measures showed ENDS rated less favorably. CO boost, after ENDS use, decreased significantly (p? Conclusions The ENDS were smoked more intensively than own brand cigarettes, but delivered significantly less nicotineand were less satisfying. These findings have implications for the viability of certain ENDS as alternatives to cigarettes.
机译:背景技术电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)是烟草控制中一个新兴的问题,有关产品使用行为的数据有限。方法参与者(N = 38,已纳入N = 16)在5天内完成了3次实验室访问,并被要求对常规卷烟弃用72小时,以使用ENDS(烟51 TRIO – 3支,第一代,剂量11 mg / ml)过滤器)。实验室检查包括呼出气一氧化碳(CO)和唾液可替宁浓度的测量,禁欲72小时后对经常吸烟的渴望的问卷调查方法以及主观产品效果。参加者使用地形设备记录抽吸量,持续时间,流速和抽吸间隔。结果分析显示,不同产品在抽吸次数,平均体积,总体积和抽吸间隔之间存在显着差异,ENDS广泛显示出更密集的吸烟模式。抽完普通烟后,烟瘾的得分显着下降,但ENDS却没有(p?= ?. 001),并且主观测量表明ENDS的评分较差。使用ENDS后,CO吸收量显着下降(p?结论)ENDS比自家品牌的卷烟吸烟强度更高,但尼古丁的输送量却少得多,也不令人满意。这些发现对某些ENDS作为卷烟替代品的可行性具有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号