首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco Induced Diseases >Advancing smoke-free public spaces: the challenge of water-pipe in the Canadian context
【24h】

Advancing smoke-free public spaces: the challenge of water-pipe in the Canadian context

机译:推进无烟公共空间:加拿大背景下水烟的挑战

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background and challenges to implementation: Canada once led the way with smoke-free public spaces and as a result, most Canadians are protected from second-hand smoke through legislation at multiple levels of government. However water-pipe tobacco, which is growing in use, has presented a challenge in existing regulation. While some jurisdictions have revised legislation to restrict water-pipe use in public spaces, there has been much opposition to such from small business owners, retailers, middle-eastern community and tobacco control industry. Intervention or response: As a result of concerted advocacy efforts, water-pipe tobacco has since been embedded within existing smoke-free public space legislation in a variety of settings. Advocates continue to strive for comprehensive legislation across Canada. Results and lessons learnt: A variety of arguments and tactics were used on both sides to further each cause. Water-pipe supporters: The cultural lens was often applied from supporters of water-pipe. Experts on history or anthropology were leveraged to give credibility to cultural arguments. Small business owners from bars and restaurants pleaded on economic grounds, citing loss of revenue and jobs. Water-pipe products were portrayed to be tobacco-free and without risk. Tobacco control community: Protection of workers was a strong counter-frame. Heath experts and scientists put together a narrative demonstrating risk and trends. Public health experts highlighted tobacco content in water-pipe products, inaccurately labeled as tobacco-free. Advocates leveraged the frame of protecting youth to secure quick adoption. Conclusions and key recommendations: In recent years, Canada has made great strides in securing further protection with regard to water-pipe tobacco. The battle is not yet over, and large communities within Canada continue to be without regulation. Cases from across Canada can serve as useful lessons to make progress in the rest of the country and in the global context.
机译:实施的背景和挑战:加拿大曾经以无烟公共场所为首,因此,大多数加拿大人通过各级政府的立法保护免受二手烟的侵害。然而,正在使用的水烟烟草在现有法规中提出了挑战。尽管一些司法管辖区修订了立法以限制公共场所中使用水管,但小企业主,零售商,中东社区和烟草控制行业对此表示了强烈反对。干预或回应:由于人们的共同努力,自那时以来,水烟已被纳入各种环境中现有的无烟公共空间立法中。倡导者继续努力争取在加拿大各地制定全面的立法。汲取的结果和教训:双方都采用了各种论点和策略来进一步推动每个原因。水管支持者:文化镜头通常是从水管支持者那里应用的。历史或人类学专家被用来为文化争论提供可信度。酒吧和饭店的小企业主以经济理由为由,理由是收入和工作机会减少。水烟产品被描绘为无烟且无风险。烟草控制界:保护工人是一个强有力的反框架。健康专家和科学家共同叙述了风险和趋势。公共卫生专家强调了水烟产品中的烟草含量,并错误地将其标记为无烟。拥护者利用保护青年的框架来确保迅速被收养。结论和主要建议:近年来,加拿大在确保对水烟的进一步保护方面取得了长足进步。战斗尚未结束,加拿大境内的大型社区仍然没有监管。来自加拿大各地的案例可以作为有益的经验教训,以在该国其他地区和全球范围内取得进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号