...
首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco Induced Diseases >Are Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) an effective aid in smoking cessation?: A critical look
【24h】

Are Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) an effective aid in smoking cessation?: A critical look

机译:电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)是戒烟的有效辅助工具吗?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective:To evaluate the current status of knowledge on safety and effectiveness of ENDS as an potential aid in smoking cessation and raise awareness of health professionals and tobacco control advocates in this matter.Methods:Review of clinical studies, public health agencies reports, smoking cessation guidelines, regulatory policies and best practice in smoking cessation programs in various countries.Results:Tobacco industry promotes ENDS as safe and effective aid in smoking cessation. Some clinical observations and trials prove that ENDS can be supportive in quitting smoking and contribute to better quit rates than nicotine replacement therapy. However, there are more and more studies that show that ENDS are not safe and effective in smoking cessation. Critical studies indicate on the risk of ENDS use for nicotine intoxication and acute and chronic diseases, a potential of nicotine addiction among ENDS users, a big proportion of dual (cigarette and ENDS) users among ENDS consumers, sharp increase in ENDS use among teenagers and tobacco experimenters, promotion of tobacco products within ENDS advertising and promotion, lack of guidelines for using ENDS in the process of smoking cessation, lack of ENDS registration as safe and effective aid to cease smoking, contradictory statements of various medical societies on the risks and benefits of ENDS use, bans of ENDS sale and use in leading countries in tobacco control.Conclusions:There is still not clear evidence whether ENDS are safe and effective aid in smoking cessation and if they can substitute science and evidence based therapies. Moreover, these products are rather used by tobacco industry or strengthening tobacco market than for ending tobacco epidemic. Therefore, these products should not be broadly used by health professionals in treatment of tobacco dependence and advised not to be used by teenagers, pregnant women, patients with allergy, tobacco experimenters and non-smokers.
机译:目的:评估关于电子烟(ENDS)作为戒烟的潜在辅助手段的安全性和有效性的知识现状,并提高卫生专业人员和烟草控制倡导者对此事的认识。方法:临床研究综述,公共卫生机构报告,戒烟结果:烟草业推广电子尼古丁传送系统,作为安全有效的戒烟手段。一些临床观察和试验证明,ENDS可比尼古丁替代疗法更好地支持戒烟,并有助于提高戒烟率。但是,越来越多的研究表明,ENDS在戒烟方面并不安全有效。关键研究表明,使用ENDS会引起尼古丁中毒和急性和慢性疾病的风险,使用ENDS使用者的尼古丁成瘾潜力,使用ENDS的消费者中有很大比例的(香烟和ENDS)使用者,青少年和儿童中使用ENDS的人数急剧增加。烟草实验者,在ENDS广告和促销中推广烟草产品,在戒烟过程中缺乏使用ENDS的指南,缺乏将ENDS注册为戒烟的安全有效手段,各种医学协会关于风险和利益的矛盾陈述结论:尚无明确证据表明ENDS是否是安全有效的戒烟手段,是否可以替代科学和循证疗法。而且,这些产品更可被烟草业或加强烟草市场使用,而不是用于结束烟草流行。因此,健康专业人员不应将这些产品广泛用于治疗烟草依赖,并建议青少年,孕妇,过敏患者,烟草实验者和非吸烟者不要使用这些产品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号