首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco Induced Diseases >'The lobbying strategy is to keep excise as low as possible' - tobacco industry excise taxation policy in Ukraine
【24h】

'The lobbying strategy is to keep excise as low as possible' - tobacco industry excise taxation policy in Ukraine

机译:“游说策略是使消费税尽可能低”-乌克兰烟草业消费税政策

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Tobacco taxes are one of the most effective ways to reduce tobacco use. Transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) claim they wish to develop and secure excise systems that benefit both governments and the profitability of the companies themselves. The objective of the paper is to use the case of Ukraine, with its inconsistent history of excise tax changes in 1992-2008, to explore tobacco industry taxation strategies and tactics, and their implications for governmental revenues. Methods Details of tobacco industry policy on tobacco taxation in Ukraine were obtained by searching tobacco industry internal documents and various published reports. Results Even before entering the market in Ukraine, TTCs had made efforts to change the excise system in the country. In 1993-1994, TTCs lobbied the Ukrainian Government, and succeeded in achieving a lowering in tobacco tax. This, however, did not produce revenue increase they promised the Government. In 1996-1998, Ukrainian authorities increased excise several times, ignoring the wishes of TTCs, caused significant growth in revenue. Due to TTCs lobbying activities in 1999-2007 the tax increases were very moderate and it resulted in increased tobacco consumption in Ukraine. In 2008, despite the TTCs position, excise rates were increased twice and it was very beneficial for revenues. Conclusions The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control includes provisions both on tobacco taxation policy and on protection of public health policy from vested interests of tobacco industry. This paper provides arguments why tobacco taxation policy should also be protected from vested interests of tobacco industry. TTCs taxation strategy appears to be consistent: keep excise as low as possible. Apparent conflicts between TTCs concerning tax structures often hide their real aim to change tax structures for competing interests without increasing total tax incidence. Governments, that aim to reduce levels of tobacco use, should not allow tobacco companies to influence the development and implementation of tobacco taxation policy.
机译:背景技术烟草税是减少烟草使用的最有效方法之一。跨国烟草公司(TTC)声称,他们希望开发并确保消费税制度对政府和公司本身都有利。本文的目的是以乌克兰为例,该国1992年至2008年间的消费税变化历史不一致,以探讨烟草业的税收策略和策略及其对政府税收的影响。方法通过搜索烟草业内部文件和各种公开报告,获得乌克兰烟草业关于烟草税收的政策细节。结果即使在进入乌克兰市场之前,TTC仍在努力改变该国的消费税制度。在1993年至1994年间,TTC游说了乌克兰政府,并成功降低了烟草税。但是,这并没有使他们向政府承诺增加收入。在1996-1998年间,乌克兰当局数次增加消费税,无视TTC的意愿,导致收入大幅增长。由于1999年至2007年TTC的游说活动,税收增长非常适度,这导致乌克兰的烟草消费量增加。在2008年,尽管拥有TTC职位,但消费税率却增加了两倍,这对收入非常有利。结论结论《烟草控制框架公约》包括有关烟草税收政策和保护公共卫生政策不受烟草业既得利益影响的规定。本文提出了为什么还要从烟草业既得利益中保护烟草税收政策的争论。 TTC的税收策略似乎是一致的:将消费税保持在尽可能低的水平。 TTC之间在税收结构方面的明显冲突常常隐藏了其为改变竞争利益而改变税收结构而不增加总税收发生率的真正目的。旨在减少烟草使用水平的政府不应允许烟草公司影响烟草税收政策的制定和实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号