...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia CIRP >Comparison of Direct and Indirect Methods for Five-axis Machine Tools Geometric Error Measurement
【24h】

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Methods for Five-axis Machine Tools Geometric Error Measurement

机译:五轴机床几何误差测量直接和间接方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Geometrical error (GE) is a key criterion for machine tools performance evaluation. GE measurement methods can be classified as direct and indirect methods. As an indirect GE measurement method, the scale and master ball artefact (SAMBA) method can estimate the GE of linear and rotary axes by probing series of master balls and a scale bar artefact installed on the machine tool pallet. The purpose of this study is to research the performance of direct and indirect GE measurement methods (i.e. laser interferometer and SAMBA method) in linear positioning error measurement such as EXX and EYY. These errors of the X- and Y-axis are separately measured on a five-axis machine tool with the two methods. The results reveal that the SAMBA method yields similar results as the laser test in error shape and range. However, there are some minor differences which are discussed.
机译:几何误差(GE)是评估机床性能的关键标准。 GE测量方法可以分为直接方法和间接方法。作为一种间接的GE测量方法,刻度和主控球伪像(SAMBA)方法可以通过探测一系列主控球和安装在机床托盘上的刻度尺伪像来估计线性轴和旋转轴的GE。这项研究的目的是研究直接和间接GE测量方法(即激光干涉仪和SAMBA方法)在线性定位误差测量中的性能,例如EXX和EYY。 X轴和Y轴的这些误差是使用两种方法在五轴机床上分别测量的。结果表明,SAMBA方法在误差形状和范围上产生的结果与激光测试相似。但是,这里讨论了一些细微的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号