...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. >Effects of a combination of umeclidinium/vilanterol on exercise endurance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: two randomized, double-blind clinical trials
【24h】

Effects of a combination of umeclidinium/vilanterol on exercise endurance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: two randomized, double-blind clinical trials

机译:乌米地林/维兰特罗联合治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者运动耐力的影响:两项随机,双盲临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Exercise intolerance is a hallmark of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Methods: Patients with COPD were randomized in two multicentre, double-blind, incomplete block crossover studies. Patients received two of six treatments in sequence (12 weeks each): placebo, umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) (125/25 mcg or 62.5/25 mcg), VI (25 mcg) or UMEC (62.5 mcg or 125 mcg). Exercise endurance time (EET) and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (Week 12) were co-primary endpoints. Safety was monitored throughout.Results: Both studies showed similar 3-hour post-dose EET improvements from baseline for UMEC/VI (Week 12). Significant EET improvements were observed with both UMEC/VI doses versus placebo at Week 12 in Study 418 (UMEC/VI 125/25 mcg: 65.8 s; p = 0.005; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg: 69.4 s; p = 0.003), but not in Study 417, where a placebo effect was evident. Post hoc integrated data analysis showed significant but smaller EET improvements for both UMEC/VI doses versus placebo at Week 12 (UMEC/VI 125/25?mcg: 47.5 s; p = 0.002; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg: 43.7 s; p = 0.001). Both studies showed trough FEV1 improvements at Week 12 for both UMEC/VI doses. The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatment groups within each study.Conclusions: UMEC/VI improved lung function and EET.
机译:目的:不耐运动是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的标志。方法:将COPD患者随机分为两个多中心,双盲,不完全阻塞交叉研究。患者按顺序接受六种治疗方法中的两种(每12周一次):安慰剂,umeclidinium(UMEC)/ vilanterol(VI)(125/25 mcg或62.5 / 25 mcg),VI(25 mcg)或UMEC(62.5 mcg或125 mcg )。共同的主要终点是运动耐力时间(EET)和1秒内的低谷呼气量(FEV1)(第12周)。整个过程都进行了安全性监测。结果:两项研究均显示,与UMEC / VI(第12周)相比,给药后EET的基线水平有3小时的相似改善。在研究418中,在第12周时,使用UMEC / VI剂量和使用安慰剂均观察到EET显着改善(UMEC / VI 125/25 mcg:65.8 s; p = 0.005; UMEC / VI 62.5 / 25 mcg:69.4 s; p = 0.003) ,但在研究417中却没有,安慰剂的作用很明显。事后综合数据分析显示,与安慰剂相比,第12周时UMEC / VI剂量的EET改善显着但较小(UMEC / VI 125/25?mcg:47.5 s; p = 0.002; UMEC / VI 62.5 / 25 mcg:43.7 s; p = 0.001)。两项研究均显示,UMEC / VI剂量的FEV1谷值均在第12周有所改善。每个研究中各治疗组之间不良事件的发生率相似。结论:UMEC / VI改善了肺功能和EET。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号