首页> 外文期刊>The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration >Values: linking Hosftede's cultural dimensions to Adrian-Paul Iliescu's 'right' & 'left' interpretations from Popper's 'open society' perspective
【24h】

Values: linking Hosftede's cultural dimensions to Adrian-Paul Iliescu's 'right' & 'left' interpretations from Popper's 'open society' perspective

机译:价值观:从波普尔的“开放社会”角度将霍斯泰德的文化维度与阿德里安·保罗·伊利埃斯库的“右”与“左”解释联系起来

获取原文
       

摘要

The study presented in this article aims at identifying a framework for value analysis in linking Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and the dually oriented, left-right, value-ideological options of Adrian-Paul Iliescu’s theory, from Popper’s “open society” perspective, and with a focus on the Romanian democratic context. In relation with the theoretical framework, there was an ex ante expectation that the ideological right (valorization towards the right of freedom, equality, solidarity and the market economy) must be correlated with the value dimensions specific to the Western liberal democracies (low Power Distance, Individualism, Acceptance of Risks). Against this perspective, for the considered sample in the study, it can be underlined that the respondents with ideological orientation to the right according to Adrian-Paul Iliescu’s theory also manifested a mainly positive orientation towards Hofstede’s dimensions specific to liberal democracies: moderate Risk Acceptance and moderate Individualism, although a bias towards high. Power Distance must be pointed out. In spite of sampling limitations, the study confirmed certain relationships among the value domains afferent to the two considered theories, from an “open society” perspective.
机译:本文提出的研究旨在确定一个价值分析框架,该框架将霍夫斯泰德的文化维度与阿德里安·保罗·伊利埃斯库理论的双向,左右,价值意识形态选择联系起来,从波普尔的“开放社会”角度出发,并与关注罗马尼亚的民主环境。在理论框架方面,人们曾事先想到,意识形态权(对自由权,平等权,团结权和市场经济权的评估)必须与西方自由民主国家特定的价值维度(低权力距离)相关联。 ,个人主义,接受风险)。从这个角度出发,对于研究中考虑的样本,可以强调的是,根据阿德里安·保罗·伊利埃斯库(Adrian-Paul Iliescu)的理论,具有正确意识形态取向的受访者也对霍夫斯泰德的自由民主制维度表现出主要的积极取向:适度的风险接受和温和的个人主义,尽管偏向高。必须指出功率距离。尽管存在抽样限制,但该研究从“开放社会”的角度证实了两种考虑的理论所涉及的价值域之间的某些关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号