首页> 外文期刊>The Saudi Dental Journal >Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with indirect composite inlay and onlay restorations – An in vitro study
【24h】

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with indirect composite inlay and onlay restorations – An in vitro study

机译:用间接复合嵌体和嵌体修复体修复的牙髓治疗牙齿的断裂阻力–一项体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance and fracture mode of extensive indirect inlay and onlay composite resin restorations performed for endodontically treated premolars. Materials and methods A total of 55 extracted maxillary premolars were randomly divided into four groups. The first group ( n = 15) remained untreated to serve as a positive control; the second group ( n = 15) was endodontically treated with inlay cavities prepared and restored with indirect composite inlay restorations; the third group ( n = 15) was also endodontically treated with onlay cavities prepared and restored with indirect composite onlay restorations; and the fourth group ( n = 10) was endodontically treated with mesio-occlusodistal (MOD) cavities prepared and left unrestored to serve as negative controls. Dual cure indirect composite resin was used to fabricate the inlay and onlay restorations performed for the second and third groups, respectively. All teeth were subjected to compressive axial loading test using a metal ball (6 mm in diameter) in a universal testing machine (Instron 1195) with a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min until a fracture occurred. Statistical analysis of fracture resistance and fracture mode were performed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) ( α = 0.05) and Kruskal–Wallis ( α = 0.05) tests, respectively. Results For the four treatment groups, the mean fracture resistance values were 1326.9 N, 1500.1 N, 1006.1 N, and 702.7 N, respectively. Statistical analyses showed no significant differences between the mean fracture resistance of the intact tooth group and the inlay restoration group ( p 0.05), while significant differences were observed between the mean fracture resistance of all the other groups ( p 0.05). The Kruskal–Wallis test showed statistically significant differences between the fracture modes of the four groups. Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, endodontically treated teeth were successfully restored with indirect composite inlay and onlay restorations. However, the fractures that accompanied the inlay restorations were more severe and were unable to be restored.
机译:目的这项体外研究的目的是评估和比较牙髓治疗前磨牙进行的广泛的间接镶嵌和镶嵌复合树脂修复体的抗断裂性和断裂模式。材料和方法总共提取55颗上颌前磨牙,随机分为四组。第一组(n = 15)仍未接受治疗以作为阳性对照。第二组(n = 15)用牙槽腔进行牙髓治疗,并用间接复合嵌体修复体修复。第三组(n = 15)也进行了根管治疗,并准备了间接复合覆盖修复体。第四组(n = 10)用制备的中颌咬合肌(MOD)腔内牙髓治疗,并恢复原状以用作阴性对照。使用双重固化间接复合树脂来分别制造第二组和第三组的镶嵌和镶嵌修复体。使用万能试验机(Instron 1195)中的直径为6 mm的金属球对所有牙齿进行压缩轴向载荷试验,十字头速度为0.5 mm / min,直到发生断裂。分别采用方差分析(ANOVA)(α= 0.05)和Kruskal–Wallis(α= 0.05)测试对断裂阻力和断裂模式进行统计分析。结果对于四个治疗组,平均抗断裂强度分别为1326.9 N,1500.1 N,1006.1 N和702.7N。统计分析表明,完整牙齿组和嵌体修复组的平均抗断裂性之间无显着差异(p> 0.05),而其他所有组的平均抗断裂性之间也无显着差异(p <0.05)。 Kruskal–Wallis检验显示出四组骨折模式之间的统计学差异。结论在本研究的范围内,采用间接复合嵌体和嵌体修复体成功地修复了经牙髓治疗的牙齿。但是,伴随嵌体修复的骨折更加严重,无法修复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号