首页> 外文期刊>The South Asianist >Who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflict
【24h】

Who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflict

机译:谁在说话?共同选择,权威和国家构想:冲突中的妇女和性暴力叙述

获取原文
       

摘要

This article presents an investigation of the forces of authority and co-option surrounding the documentation of violence and specifically sexual violence against women in conflict, and examines the representation of survivors in media and academic sources. The first section focusses on the use of oral testimony in the conflicts in East Pakistan/Bangladesh in 1971 and the disintegration of Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and how survivors' narratives are interpreted and communicated. It then goes on to examine the representation of violence against women in the Bangladesh conflict in a variety of South Asian newspaper sources in the years immediately following 1971. This is then further explored in the final section where these media discourses display the co-opting of women's experiences into discourses of nation-building and state legitimacy in Bangladesh. The article concludes that the sources examined reflect a tendency for narratives of sexual violence in conflict to be co-opted or otherwise 'used' for secondary political purposes by the media, the state and even academic researchers, such that the women survivors retain little authority over the communication of their 'history' and its utilisation.
机译:本文围绕暴力冲突,特别是针对冲突中对妇女的性暴力的记录,对权威和共存力量进行了调查,并考察了媒体和学术界幸存者的代表性。第一部分着重于在1971年东巴基斯坦/孟加拉国的冲突和1990年代南斯拉夫的解体中使用口头证词,以及如何解释和传达幸存者的叙述。然后,它继续研究了紧接1971年之后的各年南亚报纸来源中对孟加拉国冲突中暴力侵害妇女行为的代表情况。然后,在最后一节中进一步探讨了这一点,这些媒体话语展示了妇女在孟加拉国建立国家和国家合法性方面的经验。文章的结论是,所审查的资料反映出,媒体,国家甚至学术研究人员将冲突中性暴力的叙述倾向用于或以其他方式“用于”次要政治目的,使得女性幸存者几乎没有权力通过他们的“历史”及其利用的交流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号