首页> 外文期刊>The Saudi Dental Journal >The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins
【24h】

The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins

机译:机械和化学抛光技术对热聚合和可见光聚合丙烯酸义齿基料树脂表面粗糙度的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of mechanical polishing (MP) and chemical polishing (CP) on the average surface roughness (Ra) of heat-cured (HC) and light-cured (LC) denture base acrylic resins. Methods A total of 120 specimens (30×15×3mm) were prepared from one HC and one LC acrylic resin. To remove nodules and gross surface irregularities, all specimens were finished with a lathe-mounted small acrylic bur and 360-grit sandpaper. Ten finished specimens of each acrylic resin were randomly assigned to each of six polishing techniques: Resilit High-luster Polishing Liquid (RHPL), Universal Polishing Paste, Abraso-star K50, pumice, Jet Seal Liquid, or Acrypoint. MP was performed with an automatic polishing machine for 2min, under 50rpm and 500g of load. CP was performed by immersing the HC and LC specimens in preheated methyl methacrylate at 75±1°C for 10s. The surface roughness of the acrylic resin specimens was measured with a contact profilometer. The Ra values were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance, post hoc Scheffe's test, and paired t -test ( p ?0.05). Polished and tested acrylic resin surfaces were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Results MP was more effective than CP. The smoothest surface was obtained with the use of the RHPL on the LC (0.05±0.01μm) or HC (0.07±0.01μm) acrylic resin. Two-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference between MP and CP. Conclusions MP produced the smoothest surface of denture base acrylic resin. The mean surface roughness values after MP and CP were not influenced by the type of acrylic resin.
机译:目的本研究的目的是比较机械抛光(MP)和化学抛光(CP)对热固化(HC)和光固化(LC)义齿基丙烯酸树脂的平均表面粗糙度(Ra)的影响。方法用一种HC和一种LC丙烯酸树脂制备120个试样(30×15×3mm)。为了去除结节和表面的不规则性,所有标本均用安装在车床上的小丙烯酸钻和360目砂纸进行抛光。每种丙烯酸树脂的十个最终样品被随机分配给以下六种抛光技术中的每一种:弹性高光泽抛光液(RHPL),通用抛光膏,Abraso-star K50,浮石,喷射密封液或Acrypoint。用自动抛光机在50rpm和500g负荷下进行MP 2分钟。通过将HC和LC样品浸入75±1°C的预热甲基丙烯酸甲酯中10s进行CP。用接触轮廓仪测量丙烯酸树脂样品的表面粗糙度。通过双向方差分析,事后Scheffe检验和配对t检验对Ra值进行分析(p = 0.05)。通过扫描电子显微镜评估抛光和测试的丙烯酸树脂表面。结果MP比CP更有效。在LC(0.05±0.01μm)或HC(0.07±0.01μm)丙烯酸树脂上使用RHPL可获得最光滑的表面。双向方差分析显示MP和CP之间存在统计学上的显着差异。结论MP产生了义齿基丙烯酸树脂最光滑的表面。 MP和CP之后的平均表面粗糙度值不受丙烯酸树脂类型的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号