首页> 外文期刊>The Open Sports Sciences Journal >A Comparison of Distance Fly Casting Performance Between Three 5-Weight Long-belly Floating Lines
【24h】

A Comparison of Distance Fly Casting Performance Between Three 5-Weight Long-belly Floating Lines

机译:三条5磅重的长腹浮线之间的远距离蝇飞性能比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Long-belly fly lines have gained extensive popularity around the world, both for fishing and for competitivedistance casting. In Sweden, three long-belly fly lines are used as official lines in Fly Casting competitions: The MasteryExpert Distance (Scientific Anglers, USA), the Rio Gold Tournament (Rio, USA) and the Barrio GT140 (Barrio Fly Lines,Scotland). The objective of this study was to compare distance casting performance between the three long-belly fly linesusing a standardized test protocol. Sixteen elite casters, eight competitors in Fly Casting and eight competitors in Casting,each performed eight casts with all three lines. All lines were cast in a randomized manner with the same type of rod (MSXSapphire 790-4) fitted with the same type of reel and identical leaders. The test was performed as an indoor competition usingthe overhead cast technique. The statistical analyses revealed no significant differences between the lines. This result wasconsistent both for the whole group (p>0.05) and when the results from the subgroups of competitors in Fly Casting andCasting were analyzed separately (p>0.05). The conclusion of the study is that at group level there are no significantdifferences in distance casting performance between the three lines when casting is performed indoors. At an individual level,however, some casters may have preferences for a specific line. These preferences may be related to factors such as thefamiliarity with the line, or how well it suits an individual casting technique.
机译:长腹蝇线已在世界范围内广泛流行,无论是钓鱼还是竞技距离投掷。在瑞典,Fly Casting竞赛使用了三条长腹蝇线作为官方线:MasteryExpert Distance(美国科学钓鱼者),Rio金牌锦标赛(美国里约)和Barrio GT140(苏格兰Barrio飞行线)。这项研究的目的是使用标准测试方案比较三条长腹蝇线之间的远程投掷性能。 16个精英施法者,Fly Casting的8个竞争对手和Casting的8个竞争对手,每一个都用全部3条线进行了8次施法。所有生产线均以随机方式使用装有相同类型的卷轴和相同引线的相同类型的杆(MSXSapphire 790-4)浇铸。该测试是使用高架石膏技术在室内比赛中进行的。统计分析表明线之间没有显着差异。整个组(p> 0.05)和分别分析Fly Casting和Casting的竞争者亚组的结果(p> 0.05)都是一致的。研究的结论是,在室内进行铸造时,在小组水平上,三条生产线之间的远距离铸造性能没有显着差异。但是,在个体层面上,某些脚轮可能对特定的线有偏爱。这些偏好可能与诸如对生产线的熟悉程度或与单个铸造技术的适应程度等因素有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号