...
首页> 外文期刊>The Open Epidemiology Journal >Power and Error: Increased Risk of False Positive Results in Underpowered Studies
【24h】

Power and Error: Increased Risk of False Positive Results in Underpowered Studies

机译:权力与错误:在能力不足的研究中出现假阳性结果的风险增加

获取原文

摘要

It is well recognised that low statistical power increases the probability of type II error, that is it reduces the probability of detecting a difference between groups, where a difference exists. Paradoxically, low statistical power also increases the likelihood that a statistically significant finding is actually falsely positive (for a given p-value). Hence, ethical concerns regarding studies with low statistical power should include the increased risk of type I error in such studies reporting statistically significant effects. This paper illustrates the effect of low statistical power by comparing hypothesis testing with diagnostic test evaluation using concepts familiar to clinicians, such as positive and negative predicative values. We also note that, where there is a high probability that the null hypothesis is true, statistically significant findings are even more likely to be falsely positive.
机译:众所周知,较低的统计功效会增加II型错误的可能性,也就是说,它会降低检测存在差异的组之间差异的可能性。矛盾的是,低的统计功效还增加了具有统计学意义的发现实际上是假阳性(对于给定的p值)的可能性。因此,有关具有低统计功效的研究的伦理问题应包括在报告具有统计学显着影响的此类研究中I型错误的风险增加。本文通过将假设检验与诊断检验评估进行比较,从而说明了低统计能力的影响,这些检验使用了临床医生熟悉的概念,例如正负判定值。我们还注意到,在原假设很可能为真的情况下,具有统计意义的发现甚至更有可能是假阳性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号