id='p-1'>Background: The majority of errors in laboratory medicine testing are thought to occur in the pre- and postanalytic testing phases, and a large propo'/> Laboratory Medicine Handoff Gaps Experienced by Primary Care Practices: A Report from the Shared Networks of Collaborative Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP)
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice >Laboratory Medicine Handoff Gaps Experienced by Primary Care Practices: A Report from the Shared Networks of Collaborative Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP)
【24h】

Laboratory Medicine Handoff Gaps Experienced by Primary Care Practices: A Report from the Shared Networks of Collaborative Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP)

机译:初级保健实践经历的实验室医学移交差距:协作式门诊实践和合作伙伴共享网络(SNOCAP)的报告

获取原文
           

摘要

id="sec-1" class="subsection"> id="p-1">Background: The majority of errors in laboratory medicine testing are thought to occur in the pre- and postanalytic testing phases, and a large proportion of these errors are secondary to failed handoffs. Because most laboratory tests originate in ambulatory primary care, understanding the gaps in handoff processes within and between laboratories and practices is imperative for patient safety. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand, based on information from primary care practice personnel, the perceived gaps in laboratory processes as a precursor to initiating process improvement activities. id="sec-2" class="subsection"> id="p-2">Design: A survey was used to assess perceptions of clinicians, staff, and management personnel of gaps in handoffs between primary care practices and laboratories working in 21 Colorado primary care practices. Data were analyzed to determine statistically significant associations between categorical variables. In addition, qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended survey questions was conducted. id="sec-3" class="subsection"> id="p-3">Results: Primary care practices consistently reported challenges and a desireeed to improve their efforts to systematically track laboratory test status, confirm receipt of laboratory results, and report results to patients. Automated tracking systems existed in roughly 61% of practices, and all but one of those had electronic health record–based tracking systems in place. One fourth of these electronic health record–enabled practices expressed sufficient mistrust in these systems to warrant the concurrent operation of an article-based tracking system as backup. Practices also reported 12 different procedures used to notify patients of test results, varying by test result type. id="sec-4" class="subsection"> id="p-4">Conclusion: The results highlight the lack of standardization and definition of roles in handoffs in primary care laboratory practices for test ordering, monitoring, and receiving and reporting test results. Results also identify high-priority gaps in processes and the perceptions by practice personnel that practice improvement in these areas is needed. Commonalities in these areas warrant the development and support of tools for use in primary care settings.
机译:id =“ sec-1” class =“ subsection”> id =“ p-1”> 背景:实验室医学测试中的大多数错误被认为是在以及分析后的测试阶段,这些错误中的很大一部分是失败的切换所导致的。由于大多数实验室测试源自门诊式初级保健,因此了解实验室与实践之间以及实验室与实践之间的移交过程中的差距对于患者安全至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是基于初级保健实践人员的信息,了解在实验室过程中所感知到的差距,这是发起过程改进活动的先决条件。 id =“ sec-2” class =“ subsection”> id =“ p-2”> 设计:使用了一项调查来评估对临床医生,工作人员和管理人员,初级保健实践与从事21个科罗拉多州初级保健实践的实验室之间的交接缺口。分析数据以确定分类变量之间的统计学显着关联。此外,对开放式调查问题的回答进行了定性分析。 id =“ sec-3” class =“ subsection”> id =“ p-3”> 结果:初级保健实践一致报告了挑战和希望/需要改进他们的努力,以系统地跟踪实验室测试状态,确认收到实验室结果并将结果报告给患者。大约61%的实践中都存在自动跟踪系统,除其中之一外,所有系统均已安装了基于电子病历的跟踪系统。这些启用电子健康记录的做法中有四分之一表示对这些系统的不信任,以保证同时运行基于文章的跟踪系统作为备份。实践还报告了12种不同的程序用于通知患者测试结果,具体取决于测试结果类型。 id =“ sec-4” class =“ subsection”> id =“ p-4”> 结论:结果突出表明缺乏标准化和定义初级保健实验室实践中交接中的角色,以进行测试订购,监控以及接收和报告测试结果。结果还确定了流程中的高优先级差距,以及需要实践人员在这些方面进行改进的看法。这些领域的共性需要开发和支持用于初级保健机构的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号