首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet Global Health >Fixed-combination, low-dose, triple-pill antihypertensive medication versus usual care in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in Sri Lanka: a within-trial and modelled economic evaluation of the TRIUMPH trial
【24h】

Fixed-combination, low-dose, triple-pill antihypertensive medication versus usual care in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in Sri Lanka: a within-trial and modelled economic evaluation of the TRIUMPH trial

机译:斯里兰卡轻中度高血压患者的固定组合低剂量三药抗高血压药物与常规治疗的比较:TRIUMPH试验的试验和模拟经济评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Summary Background Elevated blood pressure incurs a major health and economic burden, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. The Triple Pill versus Usual Care Management for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension (TRIUMPH) trial showed a greater reduction in blood pressure in patients using fixed-combination, low-dose, triple-pill antihypertensive therapy (consisting of amlodipine, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone) than in those receiving usual care in Sri Lanka. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the triple-pill strategy. Methods We did a within-trial (6-month) and modelled (10-year) economic evaluation of the TRIUMPH trial, using the health system perspective. Health-care costs, reported in 2017 US dollars, were determined from trial records and published literature. A discrete-time simulation model was developed, extrapolating trial findings of reduced systolic blood pressure to 10-year health-care costs, cardiovascular disease events, and mortality. The primary outcomes were the proportion of people reaching blood pressure targets (at 6 months from baseline) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted (at 10 years from baseline). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated to estimate the cost per additional participant achieving target blood pressure at 6 months and cost per DALY averted over 10 years. Findings The triple-pill strategy, compared with usual care, cost an additional US$9·63 (95% CI 5·29 to 13·97) per person in the within-trial analysis and $347·75 (285·55 to 412·54) per person in the modelled analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated at $7·93 (95% CI 6·59 to 11·84) per participant reaching blood pressure targets at 6 months and $2842·79 (?28·67 to 5714·24) per DALY averted over a 10-year period. Interpretation Compared with usual care, the triple-pill strategy is cost-effective for patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Scaled up investment in the triple pill for hypertension management in Sri Lanka should be supported to address the high population burden of cardiovascular disease. Funding Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
机译:背景技术血压升高会给健康和经济带来重大负担,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家。轻度至中度高血压患者的三药对一般护理管理(TRIUMPH)试验显示,使用固定组合低剂量三药抗高血压疗法(包括氨氯地平,替米沙坦,和氯噻酮)比那些在斯里兰卡接受常规护理的人要多。我们旨在评估三药战略的成本效益。方法我们使用卫生系统的观点对TRIUMPH试验进行了试验内(6个月)和模型化(10年)经济评估。卫生保健费用以2017年美元报告,是根据试验记录和已发表的文献确定的。开发了离散时间模拟模型,将降低的收缩压的试验结果外推到10年的医疗保健费用,心血管疾病事件和死亡率。主要结果是达到血压目标(距基线6个月)和避免残疾调整生命年(DALYs)(距基线10年)的人口比例。计算了增量成本效益比,以估算6个月后每增加一名达到目标血压的参与者的成本,以及每10年避免的DALY的成本。研究结果与常规护理相比,三药疗法在审判内分析中每人额外花费$ 9·63(95%CI 5·29至13·97)和347·75美元(285·55至412· 54)每人在建模分析中。在6个月内达到血压目标的每位参与者的成本效益比增量估计为$ 7·93(95%CI 6·59至11·84)和每避免一个DALY达到$ 2842·79(?28·67至5714·24) 10年期限。解释与常规护理相比,三丸策略对轻度至中度高血压患者具有成本效益。应该支持扩大对斯里兰卡高血压治疗三药丸的投资,以解决心血管疾病的高人口负担。资助澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究理事会。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号