首页> 外文期刊>The Open Construction & Building Technology Journal >Comparative Analysis of RC Irregular Buildings Designed According toDifferent Seismic Design Codes
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of RC Irregular Buildings Designed According toDifferent Seismic Design Codes

机译:不同抗震设计规范设计的RC不规则建筑物的对比分析

获取原文
       

摘要

The present paper presents a comparison of seismic provisions of three seismic design codes, the Philippinecode, Eurocode 8 and the American code, to the most common ordinary residential frames of standard occupancy. Regularand irregular reinforced concrete frames were analyzed and compared for four storey building types. The responsespectrum and the seismic parameters of NSCP 2010 were considered for the horizontal load action with different loadcombinations. Response spectrum analysis and equivalent lateral force analysis were performed using SAP2000 softwarepackage. Five representative columns for each RC frame structure were analyzed. Based on the results of column axialload - bending moment interaction diagrams, EC8 was found to be conservative when compared to NSCP 2010 and 2009IBC. The conclusion is that for the design and analysis of ordinary RC residential buildings with certain irregularity, EC8provisions were considered to be safer.
机译:本文介绍了三种抗震设计规范(菲律宾规范,欧洲规范8和美国规范)与最常见的标准居住普通住宅框架的抗震规定的比较。分析并比较了四层建筑类型的规则和不规则钢筋混凝土框架。考虑了NSCP 2010在不同荷载组合下的水平荷载作用下的响应谱和地震参数。使用SAP2000软件包进行了响应谱分析和等效侧向力分析。每个RC框架结构的五个代表性列进行了分析。根据柱轴向载荷-弯矩相互作用图的结果,与NSCP 2010和2009IBC相比,EC8被认为是保守的。结论是,对于具有某些不规则性的普通RC住宅建筑物的设计和分析,认为EC8设置更安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号