首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Concomitant Endografting of a?Type B Aortic Dissection During Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement
【24h】

Concomitant Endografting of a?Type B Aortic Dissection During Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement

机译:经股主动脉瓣置换术中伴有B型主动脉夹层的内移植

获取原文
           

摘要

An 87-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis underwent a transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated a well-seated valve with no paravalvular leak; however, a new acute type B aortic dissection was identified. Endografts were delivered through the TAVR sheath and deployed, effectively treating the dissection. The patient did well postoperatively, with imaging at 2 years demonstrating a well-functioning aortic valve and no migration or endoleak of the thoracic endografts. To our knowledge, this is the first report of successful concomitant thoracic endografting during TAVR for the treatment of iatrogenic aortic dissection in this setting.;;Dr Szeto discloses a financial relationship with Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, LivaNova, and Micro?Interventional Devices; Dr Bavaria with Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, COOK Medical, Boston Scientific, W. L. Gore and Associates, and St Jude Medical; Dr Anwaruddin with Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic; Dr Desai with Medtronic and W. L. Gore and Associates.;To our knowledge, this is the first report of concomitant TEVAR for the treatment of an iatrogenic acute type B aortic dissection during transfemoral TAVR. Preoperative imaging can identify patients at high risk for this complication based on anatomic factors including degree of calcification and tortuosity of the aorta. In this particular case, there was severe calcification and angulation of the distal aortic arch. It is likely that the TAVR valve, during arch transit, caused lifting of a calcific plaque, leading to flow between the plaque and the adventitial layer that progressed antegrade into a true Debakey IIIa dissection.Acute uncomplicated type B dissections have classically been managed with medical therapy. Proponents of the medical therapy strategy have pointed to a lack of firm data establishing a survival benefit to TEVAR in this clinical setting. In addition, there are operative risks associated with TEVAR, including a risk of retrograde type A dissection.We advocate for TEVAR in this scenario because of several factors. The risk of mortality is significantly increased in iatrogenic versus spontaneous type B dissections (37% versus 10%) [3][3]. In the setting of TAVR, the first report of an iatrogenic type B dissection was unrecognized and resulted in rupture and death [4][4]. Presumably, the depth of injury in these cases extends further into the aortic wall than traditional type B dissection, which begins with a primary intimal tear. From a technical standpoint, the endografts can be delivered through the existing TAVR access and wires. Particular attention should be paid to not oversizing the endografts more than 10% to mitigate the risk of retrograde dissection. For this reason, it is our practice to oversize grafts by 10% and to avoid ballooning in aortic dissections. In this case, we used traditional sizing measurements based on preoperative computed tomography to size the endograft. We typically use preoperative spinal drains in all patients considered high risk for spinal ischemia, although no drain was placed in this case because it was an unplanned urgent procedure. Our protocol for postoperative spinal cord ischemia is spinal drainage to a cerebrospinal fluid pressure less than 10 cm H20 and maintaining mean arterial pressures greater than 90 mm Hg.In the longer term, randomized trial data from the ADSORB and INSTEAD clinical trials have demonstrated significant improvements in aortic remodeling in patients treated with TEVAR for acute uncomplicated type B dissections, with higher rates of complete false lumen thrombosis and greater reduction of false lumen diameter compared with medical therapy alone [5, 6]. In conclusion, we demonstrate the first case of concomitant TEVAR for iatrogenic acute type B dissection during transfemoral TAVR and advocate for its use in this setting because of technical ease, the reduction in associate
机译:一名患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄的87岁妇女接受了经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)。术中经食管超声心动图检查显示瓣膜位置良好,无瓣周漏。然而,发现了一种新的急性B型主动脉夹层。内移植物通过TAVR鞘输送并展开,有效地治疗了剥离。该患者术后表现良好,在2年时进行了影像学检查,显示主动脉瓣功能良好,胸腔内移植物没有迁移或内渗。据我们所知,这是在这种情况下成功进行TAVR并成功治疗医源性主动脉夹层的胸腔内移植的第一份报告。 Bavaria博士与Edwards Lifesciences,Medtronic,COOK Medical,Boston Scientific,W.L。Gore and Associates和St Jude Medical合作; Edwards Lifesciences和Medtronic的Anwaruddin博士; Desai博士与Medtronic和W. L. Gore and Associates。一起;据我们所知,这是伴随TEVAR治疗经股动脉TAVR期间医源性急性B型主动脉夹层的首次报道。术前影像检查可根据包括钙化程度和主动脉曲折度在内的解剖学因素识别出该并发症高风险的患者。在这种特殊情况下,主动脉弓远端有严重的钙化和成角。 TAVR瓣膜在足弓穿刺过程中可能引起钙化斑块抬高,导致斑块与外膜层之间的血流逐渐发展为真正的Debakey IIIa剥离。治疗。支持药物治疗策略的人士指出,缺乏确定的数据可确定TEVAR在此临床环境中的生存获益。此外,TEVAR还存在手术风险,包括逆行A型夹层的风险。由于多种因素,我们在这种情况下主张使用TEVAR。医源性和自发性B型夹层的死亡风险显着增加(37%vs 10%)[3] [3]。在TAVR的背景下,医源性B型夹层的第一个报道未被认识,并导致破裂和死亡[4] [4]。据推测,在这些情况下,受伤的深度比传统的B型剥离更深入主动脉壁,传统的B型剥离从原发性内膜撕裂开始。从技术角度来看,可以通过现有的TAVR通道和导线来进行内移植。应特别注意不要将内移植物过大,以免发生逆行解剖的风险。因此,我们的做法是将移植物超大10%,并避免在主动脉夹层中出现球囊膨胀。在这种情况下,我们使用基于术前计算机断层扫描的传统尺寸测量来确定内移植物的大小。我们通常在所有被认为具有高脊髓缺血风险的患者中使用术前脊柱引流管,尽管在这种情况下没有放置引流管是因为这是计划外的紧急手术。术后脊髓缺血的治疗方案是脊柱引流至脑脊液压力低于10 cm H20并保持平均动脉压高于90 mm Hg。从长期来看,来自ADSORB和INSTEAD临床试验的随机试验数据显示出显着改善与单纯药物治疗相比,TEVAR治疗的急性单纯性B型夹层患者的主动脉重塑术具有更高的完全假管腔血栓形成率和更大的假管腔直径减少率[5,6]。总之,我们证明了在经股动脉TAVR期间发生医源性急性B型夹层并发TEVAR的第一例病例,并且由于技术上的便利性,联合体的减少,主张在这种情况下使用TEVAR

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号